[openstack-dev] [Solum] Command Line Interface for Solum
Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda
noorul at noorul.com
Thu Nov 14 08:02:37 UTC 2013
On Nov 14, 2013 1:10 PM, "Adrian Otto" <adrian.otto at rackspace.com> wrote:
>
> Noorul,
>
> On Nov 13, 2013, at 7:43 PM, Noorul Islam K M <noorul at noorul.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Doug Hellmann <doug.hellmann at dreamhost.com> writes:
> >
> >> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Noorul Islam K M <noorul at noorul.com
>wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Hello all,
> >>>
> >>> I registered a new blueprint [1] for command line client interface for
> >>> Solum. We need to decide whether we should have a separate repository
> >>> for this or go with new unified CLI framework [2]. Since Solum is not
> >>> part of OpenStack I think it is not the right time to go with the
> >>> unified CLI.
> >>>
> >>
> >> One of the key features of the cliff framework used for the unified
command
> >> line app is that the subcommands can be installed independently of the
main
> >> program. So you can write plugins that work with the openstack client,
but
> >> put them in the solum client library package (and source repository).
That
> >> would let you, for example:
> >>
> >> $ pip install python-solumclient
> >> $ pip install python-openstackclient
> >> $ openstack solum make me a paas
> >>
> >> Dean has done a lot of work to design a consistent
"noun-followed-by-verb"
> >> command structure, so please look at that work when picking subcommand
> >> names (for example, you shouldn't use solum as a prefix as I did in my
> >> example above, since we are removing the project names from the
commands).
> >>
> >
> > I think we should follow this. If others have no objection, I will
> > submit a review to openstack-infra/config to create a new repository
> > named python-solumclient with intial code from cookiecutter template.
> >
> > Adrian,
> >
> > Does this blue-print require to be in Approved state to perform
> > above task?
>
> Thanks for the enthusiasm! I'd like further input from additional team
members before advancing on this.
>
I think whichever path we take a separate repository is required.
Regards,
Noorul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131114/9ca5bb04/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list