Open Stack

On 11/13/2013 04:19 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:

> Of course the idempotency token *should* be just the name, but since
> most projects have inexplicably chosen not to enforce unique names (in
> tenant scope), we're in the odd position of requiring 3 ways to look up
> any resource (by name, UUID, and idempotency token). That's bonkers, but
> what can you do?

Why would the idempotency token not be the UUID?  Presumably that should 
be unique.

Chris