Open Stack

Clayton,

On Nov 13, 2013, at 11:41 AM, Clayton Coleman <ccoleman at redhat.com>
 wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Solum meets Tuesdays at 1600 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt (formerly in
>> #solum)
>> 
>> 
>> Note: Due to the Nov 3rd change in Daylight Savings Time, this now happens at
>> 08:00 US/Pacific (starts in about 45 minutes from now)
>> 
>> 
>> Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Solum
> 
> In the meeting yesterday there was a mention of a "gated" source code flow (where a push might go to an external system, and the gate system github/gerritt/etc would control when the commit goes back to the primary repository).  I've added that flow to https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/File:Solum_r01_flow.jpeg as well as a mention of the DNS abstraction (a deployed assembly may or may not have an assigned DNS identity).

Are the two "source change notification abstraction" flows really different? Could we express this with two lines converging on "Notify Solum API …" in a single flow with two similar entrances.

One key difference that I noticed between those two proposed flows are that the "gate" type uses the Solum API to test code, and the "push" one does not. Perhaps both should run unit tests in the same way with an option to bypass steps for those who don't want them?

Adrian