[openstack-dev] disable/enable services and agent tests
Joe Gordon
joe.gordon0 at gmail.com
Wed Nov 13 19:39:48 UTC 2013
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Sean Dague <sean at dague.net> wrote:
> On 11/13/2013 02:06 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Sean Dague <sean at dague.net
> > <mailto:sean at dague.net>> wrote:
> >
> > On 11/12/2013 10:25 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> > > We shouldn't really be changing the config of the cloud we're
> testing
> > > - that stops us being run against actual prod clouds.
> > >
> > > Instead we should have some set of profiles we test against - and
> then
> > > run different jobs for different profiles, avoiding the problem
> > > entirely.
> >
> > The issue here is we've got an API that's exposed to the admin to do
> > this, which means for some folks, it would be nice to test this
> > functionality is working. Per our community mantra "If it's not
> tested,
> > it's assumed broken." -
> > https://twitter.com/russellbryant/status/396889282155008000
> >
> > That being said, in this case in particular, we should probably be
> more
> > careful about disabling our only nova-compute during the tests,
> because,
> > you know, that might be bad. Today the calls happen so quickly, I
> think
> > we've just avoided the race entirely (the enable_disable test has
> been
> > in the gate since H2). I've honestly never seen a race that we can
> track
> > down to this in the gate.
> >
> > For now, I'd agree that enable_disable should probably be removed
> from a
> > normal tempest run. I think we've started to find that we have a
> class
> > of APIs that impact our runtime in a dramatic enough way, that we
> need
> > to be really careful about how we tickle them. I'd be interested in
> > ideas about how we do that. Remember we also have locking in our bag
> of
> > tricks, which is what we need to do around all the aggregate tests,
> as
> > those are admin tests on global state.
> >
> >
> > Why not just use the lock in this case?
>
> Well... the only issue is we'd actually have to also lock every compute
> call that would get to n-cpu, because the resource we are making go away
> is n-cpu. Which is a ton of lock metering for one test.
>
Good point.
>
> -Sean
>
> --
> Sean Dague
> http://dague.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131113/1c86ea9f/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list