Open Stack

On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 18:36 -0500, Dolph Mathews wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Joe Gordon <joe.gordon0 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Dolph Mathews <dolph.mathews at gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:10 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>wrote:
> >>
> >>> Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> >>> > Have you seen reviewday?
> >>> >
> >>> >   http://status.openstack.org/reviews/#keystone
> >>>
> >>> Both tools have their merits (which could probably be merged into the
> >>> one good solution):
> >>>
> >>> reviewday gives priority to important features or critical bugs, and
> >>> presents a list. It's a bit heavy (due to querying LP for priority) so
> >>> it's refreshed periodically.
> >>>
> >>> next-review tries to skip reviews that have been -1ed (to present you
> >>> the "next review to consider") and gives priority to old reviews. Its
> >>> advice is based on fresh data.
> >>>
> >>
> >> It's also personalized to what projects you're watching, what reviews
> >> you've already covered, what reviews you've commented on and generally
> >> tries to filter out as much noise as possible to put you in front of a
> >> single review that would benefit from your immediate attention.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > While I like the web interface of reviewday which allows me to see the
> > overall picture of what is ready for review, I like the personalized of
> > next-review telling me what I have already reviewed, is it possible to get
> > reviewday to be personalized the same way next-review is?
> >
> > On a related note, if you search for "is:open CodeReview+2 Verified+1
> > -Verified-1 -CodeReview-2 is:watched" on review.openstack.org you can see
> > what patches have no negative feedback and at least one +2 already.
> >
> >
> Ooh, I didn't know you could query by Verified/CodeReview-- I'll have to
> take advantage of that. Thanks!

I actually use 'git review -l' quite a bit and do things like

  $> git review -l --mine | grep -v V=-1

to exclude reviews which are failing tests

Cheers,
Mark.