[openstack-dev] Make Secgroup extension fully compatible with Quantum as part of V3
Endre Karlson
endre.karlson at gmail.com
Thu May 30 17:26:41 UTC 2013
Shouldn't this not be a part of nova but quantum? Simce Q handles more
advanced networking?
Den 30. mai 2013 17:13 skrev "Day, Phil" <philip.day at hp.com> følgende:
> Hi Folks,****
>
> ** **
>
> Currently the Nova SecGroup API extension doesn’t support the Quantum
> egress rules (as these aren’t available in the native Nova SecGroup
> implementation). This can get quite confusing if there are egress rules
> defined in Quantum that then don’t show up in Nova (I know that’s partly
> the users problem for mixing their APIs) – so I was wondering if as part of
> the V2 API work we could extend the scope of the Nova SecGroup extension to
> include the concept of egress rules, and then return a “Not Supported”
> error if someone tries to create one on a system configured for Nova
> Networking.****
>
> ** **
>
> What do people think, and how do ideas like this get tagged against the
> V3 work (new blueprint, add to an existing one, etc)****
>
> ** **
>
> Phil****
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130530/0c04da8a/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list