Open Stack

On 05/19/2013 11:45 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Gary,
>
> please see this review for allowing multiple sets of name/groups to be
> deprecated. I need @markmc and others to bless this approach.
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/29722/

Thank you for addressing this. I really appreciate it.

>
> Thanks for your patience :)
>
> -- dims
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Gary Kotton<gkotton at redhat.com>  wrote:
>> On 05/18/2013 06:57 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>> Gary,
>>>
>>> We are at a stalemate between your -1 and Dolph Mathews's -1 on what
>>> the naming of the group in session.py [1]
>>
>> I'd say that we are between a rock and a hard place :)
>>
>> Below is a partial mapping on how the projects have the section and key
>> names for the SQL database:
>>
>> Nova: Section - DEFAULT; Key - sql_connection
>> Cinder: Section - DEFAULT; Key - sql_connection
>> Glance: Section - DEFAULT; Key - sql_connection
>> Quantum: Section - DATABASE; key - sql_connection
>> Keystone: Section - SQL; key - connection
>>
>> My concern is the upgrade process and being backward compatible to the
>> existing configuration. The code that you have done works great for Nova,
>> Cinder and Glance. Problem is that it does not work for Quantum and
>> Keystone.
>>
>> Is there anyway of ensuring that the Quantum and Keystone configurations are
>> also supported. I am not sure that the common configuration module supports
>> more than one deprecated section and key name. If so great.
>>
>> I am really impartial to the section name. I prefer database but can be
>> easily swayed as it is not something that is written in stone. But What I
>> really do think is important is that we do not break things when going from
>> Grizzly to Havana.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Gary
>>
>>
>>> So throwing it out where...what should it be? "database" or
>>> "sqlalchemy"? We need to pick one and i'll change the review
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> dims
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/27345/9/openstack/common/db/sqlalchemy/session.py,unified
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Gary Kotton<gkotton at redhat.com>   wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> Any chance on getting a review for
>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/27345/.
>>>> This is blocking the OSLO DB usage of Quantum. It would be nice to be
>>>> able
>>>> to get this in by H-1.
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>
>