Open Stack

On 05/17/2013 11:04 AM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 01:00 -0700, Mark Washenberger wrote:
>> So, what do you think? Is this a bad idea? If so, why do you hate me?
>> Did copyright headers once save your kitty from a burning building?
>> Are you worried about consistency? If so, please explain why you
>> believe consistency is useful in this specific case to avoid a choice
>> Emerson quote.
>
> So, I have one question: does this advice apply only to the copyright
> header ("Copyright 2013 OpenStack Foundation") or does it apply to both
> the copyright header AND the license header?  (To my mind, these are
> logically two separate things…)
>

Just the copyright statement.

The license grant in every file is still required, as that's what makes 
the file Open Source. But copyright is by default by the Berne 
Convention, so you don't need to say "Copyright" on a file for it to be so.

	-Sean

-- 
Sean Dague
http://dague.net