Open Stack

On 05/10/2013 09:43 AM, Brant Knudson wrote:
> I was able to recreate this by enabling s-proxy in my devstack localrc.

Should we be running that s-proxy on in the devstack one then?

> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Brant Knudson <blk at acm.org
> <mailto:blk at acm.org>> wrote:
> 
> 
>     That fix was put in to get Keystone to pass the python26 gate on
>     centos, so reverting this change is going to fail Jenkins. Sorry for
>     not looking close enough yesterday to see that smokestack hadn't
>     passed (smokestack has usually finished before Jenkins). I'll
>     investigate a fix for the swift issue. - Brant
> 
> 
>     On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Dan Prince <dprince at redhat.com
>     <mailto:dprince at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>         ----- Original Message -----
>         > From: "Thierry Carrez" <thierry at openstack.org
>         <mailto:thierry at openstack.org>>
>         > To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>         <mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>         > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 8:28:30 AM
>         > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] revert keystone eventlet changes?
>         >
>         > Dan Prince wrote:
>         > > We made a change to keystone eventlet last night that seems
>         to have ground
>         > > SmokeStack to a halt:
>         > >
>         > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/28785/
>         > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1178646
>         > >
>         > > Could we get a speedy revert on that patch until we get this
>         figured out?
>         >
>         > There is also a comment on the original review that observes
>         the same
>         > failure: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/28737/
>         >
>         > Sounds like it should be reverted ASAP, and we need some tests
>         to cover
>         > that in the gate.
>         >
>         > Dan: any idea why SmokeStack was happy with it on the review ?
> 
>         ttx: From what I can see only patchset 3 ran fine in SmokeStack.
>         Patchset 4 did not get a +1 verified (and I didn't get around to
>         approving the negative result so it would post a -1).
> 
>         Dan
> 
>         >
>         > --
>         > Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>         > Release Manager, OpenStack
>         >
>         > _______________________________________________
>         > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>         > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>         <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>         > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>         >
> 
>         _______________________________________________
>         OpenStack-dev mailing list
>         OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>         <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>         http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>