Open Stack

+1 This would make the URIs a good deal cleaner to look at / work with,
especially since it isn't really relevant to the request itself.

Cheers,
--Morgan Fainberg

On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Christopher Yeoh <cbkyeoh at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Russell Bryant <rbryant at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 05/08/2013 05:27 PM, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
>> >
>> > If anyone has other arguments in favor of keeping the project ID in the
>> URL I'd love to hear them, but otherwise I formally request that it be
>> removed going forward.
>> >
>> > All the best,
>>
>> This all sounds reasonable to me.
>>
>> If everyone agrees, we need a blueprint for it and make it a pre-req for
>> the top-level v3-api blueprint.  Then, we may need a volunteer to take
>> this on to make sure it gets done in Havana.  I feel like cyoeh has a
>> pretty full v3 API plate already.
>>
>
> +1 from me. Especially the bit about someone volunteering to help make it
> happen :-)
>
> Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130508/ae75c010/attachment.html>