[openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Cinder-Core]Nomination for Cinder core members
Russell Bryant
rbryant at redhat.com
Wed May 8 20:17:27 UTC 2013
On 05/08/2013 04:00 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 05/08/2013 02:13 PM, Sheng Bo Hou wrote:
>> Hi Cinder contributors,
>>
>> I would like to be a bit immodest to nominate Vincent Hou, myself as a
>> core contributor for OpenStack Block Storage(Cinder) project.
>>
>> Last October, I began my work in cinder by testing and looking for bugs.
>> Then, by implementing the blueprint and fixing bugs. After that, I
>> started reviewing the patches. I took some screenshots from the
>> Launchpad website, indicating my contribution and how active I am in
>> cinder community. You can find my name in the list of the ranking.
>>
>> Please take a look at the snapshots below. They are why I think I can be
>> qualified core member. I sincerely hope OpenStack Cinder community can
>> take me into consideration for a new core member. Thank you very much.
>>
>> PS:
>> 1. Here are some of the snapshots for the patches I reviewed:
>
> Screenshots are kind of a bizarre way to do this ... I think links to
> relevant pages would have sufficed. :-)
>
> This message prompted me to take a look at who is doing Cinder reviews.
> I'm not on cinder-core, so I don't really get a vote, but I'll provide
> some commentary anyway. :-)
>
> Review numbers aren't the only metric, but they are something. When I
> look at these things, I'm looking for some indication of how involved
> people are, as well as whether people are putting effort into providing
> good constructive feedback with -1/-2, or if they are just rubber
> stamping things (primarily just +1/+2).
>
> Dolph Mathews summarized core member criteria *really* well in another
> thread when he said:
>
>> Ultimately, "core contributor" to me simply means that this person's downvotes on code reviews are consistently well thought out and meaningful, such that an upvote by the same person shows a lot of confidence in the patch.
>
> I think that is a *great* way to summarize the criteria that should be used.
>
> The numbers for the last 90 days are here (please correct me if the
> cinder-core members are marked incorrectly)
>
> The line for the self-nomination here is:
>
> | houshengbo | 54 (0|2|52|0) (96.3%) |
>
>
> ** -- cinder-core team member
> +-------------------+-----------------------------------+
> | Reviewer | Reviews (-2|-1|+1|+2) (+/- ratio) |
> +-------------------+-----------------------------------+
> | john-griffith ** | 307 (13|27|1|266) (87.0%) |
> | avishay-il ** | 109 (1|28|46|34) (73.4%) |
> | zhiteng-huang ** | 80 (3|14|5|58) (78.8%) |
> | rushiagr | 75 (0|11|64|0) (85.3%) |
> | thingee ** | 71 (0|19|8|44) (73.2%) |
> | duncan-thomas ** | 66 (0|15|3|48) (77.3%) |
> | houshengbo | 54 (0|2|52|0) (96.3%) |
> | kurt-f-martin | 46 (0|10|36|0) (78.3%) |
> | eharney | 38 (0|7|31|0) (81.6%) |
> | oliver-leahy-l | 26 (0|6|20|0) (76.9%) |
> | markmc | 24 (6|5|2|11) (54.2%) |
> | xing-yang | 23 (0|2|21|0) (91.3%) |
> | zulcss | 22 (1|4|11|6) (77.3%) |
> | jsbryant | 18 (0|1|17|0) (94.4%) |
> | walter-boring | 17 (0|1|16|0) (94.1%) |
> | flaper87 | 16 (0|5|11|0) (68.8%) |
> | ttx | 13 (0|0|0|13) (100.0%) |
> | apevec | 12 (2|1|0|9) (75.0%) |
> | stephen-mulcahy | 6 (0|2|4|0) (66.7%) |
> | lzy-dev | 5 (0|4|1|0) (20.0%) |
> | corystone | 5 (0|1|4|0) (80.0%) |
> | jerome-gallard | 5 (0|0|5|0) (100.0%) |
> | emilienm | 5 (0|0|5|0) (100.0%) |
> | dtynan | 4 (0|2|2|0) (50.0%) |
> | sdague | 4 (0|1|3|0) (75.0%) |
> | chmouel | 4 (0|1|3|0) (75.0%) |
> | jbresnah | 4 (0|0|4|0) (100.0%) |
> | bswartz | 4 (0|0|4|0) (100.0%) |
> | rconradharris | 3 (0|1|2|0) (66.7%) |
> | francis-moorehead | 3 (0|1|2|0) (66.7%) |
> | gandelman-a | 3 (0|1|1|1) (66.7%) |
> | dricco | 3 (0|0|3|0) (100.0%) |
> | yugsuo | 2 (0|0|2|0) (100.0%) |
> | mkerrin | 2 (0|0|2|0) (100.0%) |
> | mdegerne | 2 (0|0|2|0) (100.0%) |
> | ldbragst | 2 (0|0|2|0) (100.0%) |
> | alexpilotti | 2 (0|0|2|0) (100.0%) |
> | Liang | 2 (0|0|2|0) (100.0%) |
> | trossman | 1 (0|1|0|0) (0.0%) |
> | ndipanov | 1 (0|1|0|0) (0.0%) |
> | hubcap | 1 (0|1|0|0) (0.0%) |
> | zhangchao010 | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
> | treinish | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
> | ronenkat | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
> | neela | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
> | mengqxqx | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
> | maurosr | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
> | locke105 | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
> | lauria | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
> | krtaylor | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
> | heut2008 | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
> | ewindisch | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
> | esker | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
> | doug-hellmann | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
> | derekh | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
> | cthiel-suse | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
> | blk-u | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
> | arosen | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
> | YangLei | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
> | vishvananda ** | 1 (0|0|0|1) (100.0%) |
> +-------------------+-----------------------------------+
>
> Total reviews: 1109
>
>
I should have listed cinderclient as well, since that's another review
responsibility for cinder-core:
Reviews for the last 90 days in python-cinderclient
** -- cinder-core team member
+------------------+-----------------------------------+
| Reviewer | Reviews (-2|-1|+1|+2) (+/- ratio) |
+------------------+-----------------------------------+
| john-griffith ** | 40 (1|9|0|30) (75.0%) |
| rushiagr | 12 (0|0|12|0) (100.0%) |
| avishay-il ** | 8 (0|1|1|6) (87.5%) |
| thingee ** | 7 (0|4|0|3) (42.9%) |
| duncan-thomas ** | 7 (1|0|0|6) (85.7%) |
| eharney | 6 (0|2|4|0) (66.7%) |
| james-agentultra | 3 (0|0|3|0) (100.0%) |
| stephen-mulcahy | 2 (0|0|2|0) (100.0%) |
| bswartz | 2 (0|0|2|0) (100.0%) |
| boris-42 | 2 (0|0|2|0) (100.0%) |
| markmc | 1 (0|1|0|0) (0.0%) |
| zulcss | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
| xing-yang | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
| walter-boring | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
| stevemar | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
| mkerrin | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
| jbresnah | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
| dtynan | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
| dmllr | 1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%) |
| zhiteng-huang ** | 1 (0|0|0|1) (100.0%) |
+------------------+-----------------------------------+
Total reviews: 99
--
Russell Bryant
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list