Open Stack

I see the Nova session is now
http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/243.  I don't want to pre-empt
it - it's important that the discussion happens
in front of as many people as possible - but a 40 minute session won't get
us very far if we're all explaining what we've already got.

I can schedule a webex or two before the summit.  I'm not sure where the
majority of people are located, but maybe Wednesday 3rd April, 10am PST /
7pm CET / 8pm IDT would suit?  Get in contact with me directly if you're
interested, and particularly if you have a solution you'd like to talk
about or demonstrate, or bitch on the list if it's not a good time (or
alternatively if you just disapprove of the idea).

-- 
Ian.


On 28 March 2013 22:22, Itzik Brown <itzikb at dev.mellanox.co.il> wrote:

>  Ian,
>
> I'm going to send a basic VIF Driver and a config for a network
> configuration using macvtap as part of Mellanox Quantum Plugin.
> We can schedule an online meeting to discuss some of the key points we
> need to address before the summit.
>
> Itzik
>
>
> On 3/28/2013 7:29 PM, Ian Wells wrote:
>
>  Chuck's is not the only summit session:
>
> http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/81 (the Quantum side of things if
> you're mapping network devices)
>
> ... and I know Mellanox have also been working on that particular side of
> things too.  Perhaps we could all get together at the summit before the
> sessions for a show and tell?  We could equally work it all out in the
> sessions, but it seems it would be hard to lead a session like that without
> having some knowledge up front of what other people have done.
>
> To be fair, our code is basically Vladimir Popovski's (Zardara Storage's)
> work, tidied up and with a scheduler check to make sure there are actually
> available SRIOV functions on the node before scheduling.  It's there, it's
> actually a patch against Folsom at the moment, and it works, but I wouldn't
> lay claim to it necessarily being the One True Way to implement this (and I
> don't think it has tests enough to pass a review).
>  --
>  Ian.
>
>
>
> On 25 March 2013 16:23, Russell Bryant <rbryant at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 03/24/2013 01:44 PM, Ian Wells wrote:
>> > Yep, we've got code in test at the moment.
>>
>>  This is (at least) the second instance that I've heard of where PCI
>> passthrough has been implemented, but code hasn't surfaced yet.  It's
>> really unfortunate to see the duplication of effort happening.
>>
>> Chuck Short also proposed a design summit session on it, presumably to
>> discuss implementing it yet another time:
>>
>>     http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/29
>>
>> It would be really nice to get some code out in the open for this.  :-)
>>
>> --
>> Russell Bryant
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing listOpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.orghttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130331/bece16a2/attachment.html>