Open Stack

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Dan Wendlandt <dan at nicira.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Tomoe Sugihara <tomoe at midokura.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Tomoe Sugihara <tomoe at midokura.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I failed to ask another question. In quantum's SG rule, there's
>>> source_ip_prefix for both directions while Amazon VPC SG has source prefix
>>> for inbound and destination for outbound respectively. Is that designed
>>> model or oversight?
>>>
>>
>> How about this point? Is this current model good to go in Grizzly?
>>
>
> With security groups, the IP prefix or the security_group_id should
> already refer to the "remote" prefix (i.e., source for inbound rules,
> destination for egress).  We had a naming discussion on the list about this
> a while back, though I'd defer to Aaron or Akihiro to comment on the
> outcome.  Let's chat about this more at the team meeting monday (feel free
> to file a bug to track this discussion item.  thanks).
>

Filed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1144426

--Tomoe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130304/4451fc4a/attachment.html>