[openstack-dev] [cinder] Propose to add copying the reference images when creating a volume

Sheng Bo Hou sbhou at cn.ibm.com
Sat Jun 22 14:22:59 UTC 2013


Hi Vish,

I would like you to review this patch 
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/35460/.

I think this approach takes the least effort to fix this issue.
When we boot an instance from a volume, nova can get the volume 
information by _get_volume. kerel_id and ramdisk_id are already in the 
volume information. We just need to make nova retrieve them. In the code 
of creating instance, kernel_id and ramdisk_id are accessed by checking 
"properties"(many parts), but the volume information saved them in 
"volume_image_metadata". I just convert the data structure a bit and save 
two of this params in "properties", and it can work.

Well, if you do not see it favorable, we can work it out in another way.

Thank you.

Best wishes,
Vincent Hou (侯胜博)

Staff Software Engineer, Open Standards and Open Source Team, Emerging 
Technology Institute, IBM China Software Development Lab

Tel: 86-10-82450778 Fax: 86-10-82453660
Notes ID: Sheng Bo Hou/China/IBM at IBMCN    E-mail: sbhou at cn.ibm.com 
Address:3F Ring, Building 28 Zhongguancun Software Park, 8 Dongbeiwang 
West Road, Haidian District, Beijing, P.R.C.100193
地址:北京市海淀区东北旺西路8号中关村软件园28号楼环宇大厦3层 邮编:100193



Vishvananda Ishaya <vishvananda at gmail.com> 
2013/07/02 01:14
Please respond to
OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>


To
OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>, 
cc
jsbryant at us.ibm.com, "Duncan Thomas <duncan.thomas at gmail.com> John 
Griffith" <duncan.thomas at gmail.comduncan.thomas>
Subject
Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Propose to add copying the reference images 
when creating a volume







On Jul 1, 2013, at 3:35 AM, Sheng Bo Hou <sbhou at cn.ibm.com> wrote:

Hi Mate, 

First, thanks for answering. 
I was trying to find the way to prepare the bootable volume. 
Take the default image downloaded by devstack, there are three images: 
cirros-0.3.0-x86_64-uec, cirros-0.3.0-x86_64-uec-kernel and 
cirros-0.3.0-x86_64-uec-ramdisk. 
cirros-0.3.0-x86_64-uec-kernel is referred as the kernel image and 
cirros-0.3.0-x86_64-uec-ramdisk is referred as the ramdisk image. 

Issue: If only the image(cirros-0.3.0-x86_64-uec) is copied to the volume 
when creating a volume) from an image, this volume is unable to boot an 
instance without the references to the kernel and the ramdisk images. The 
current cinder only copies the image cirros-0.3.0-x86_64-uec to one 
targeted volume(Vol-1), which is marked as bootable but unable to do a 
successful boot with the current nova code, even if image-id is removed in 
the parameter. 

Possible solutions: There are two ways in my mind to resolve it. One is we 
just need the code change in Nova to let it find the reference images for 
the bootable volume(Vol-1) and there is no need to change anything in 
cinder, since the kernel and ramdisk id are saved in the 
volume_glance_metadata, where the references point to the images(kernel 
and ramdisk) for the volume(Vol-1). 


You should be able to create an image in glance that references the volume 
in block device mapping but also has a kernel_id and ramdisk_id parameter 
so it can boot properly. I know this is kind of an odd way to do things, 
but this seems like an edge case and I think it is a valid workaround.

Vish

The other is that if we need multiple images to boot an instance, we need 
a new way to create the bootable volume. For example, we can create three 
separate volumes for three of the images and set the new references in 
volume_glance_metadata with the kernel_volume_id and ramdisk_volume_id. 
The benefit of this approach is that the volume can live independent of 
the existence of the original images. Even the images get lost 
accidentally, the volumes are still sufficient to boot an instance, 
because all the information have been copied to Cinder part. 

I am trying to looking for the "another way to prepare your bootable 
volume" as you mentioned and asking for the suggestions. 
And I think the second approach could be one way. Do you think it is a 
good approach? 

Best wishes,
Vincent Hou (侯胜博)

Staff Software Engineer, Open Standards and Open Source Team, Emerging 
Technology Institute, IBM China Software Development Lab

Tel: 86-10-82450778 Fax: 86-10-82453660
Notes ID: Sheng Bo Hou/China/IBM at IBMCN    E-mail: sbhou at cn.ibm.com 
Address:3F Ring, Building 28 Zhongguancun Software Park, 8 Dongbeiwang 
West Road, Haidian District, Beijing, P.R.C.100193
地址:北京市海淀区东北旺西路8号中关村软件园28号楼环宇大厦3层 邮编:100193 


Mate Lakat <mate.lakat at citrix.com> 
2013/07/01 04:18 

Please respond to
OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>



To
OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>, 
cc
jsbryant at us.ibm.com, "Duncan Thomas <duncan.thomas at gmail.com> John 
Griffith" <duncan.thomas at gmail.comduncan.thomas> 
Subject
Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Propose to add copying the reference images 
when creating a volume








Hi,

I just proposed a patch for the boot_from_volume_exercise.sh to get rid
of --image. To be honest, I did not look at the various execution paths.
My initial thought is that boot from volume means you boot from volume.
If you only have a kernel + ramdisk image, I simply assumed that you
can't do it. 

I would not do any magic. Boot from volume should boot from volume. If
you only have 3 part images, you need to find another way to prepare
your bootable volume.

btw, here is my change:

https://review.openstack.org/34761

Cheers,
Mate

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 01:25:23AM -0400, Sheng Bo Hou wrote:
> Hi Cinder folks,
> 
> I am currently fixing the bugs related to booting the instance from the 
> volume. I found there are bugs both in Nova and 
> Cinder.
> 
> Cinder: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1159824
> Nova: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1191069
> 
> For the volumes created from the image, I propose to copy the reference 
> image during the creation of
> the main image. For example, an image may refer to a kernel image and a 
> ramdisk image. When we create a volume
> from this image, we only copied this one to the volume. The kernel and 
> ramdisk images are still in glance, and
> the volume still refers to the kernel and ramdisk images.
> 
> I think if an image has other reference images, the reference images 
also 
> need to be copied to the volumes(kernel volume and ramdisk volume),
> and then set the volume referring to the kernel volume and the ramdisk 
> volume. This feature will make booting from
> a volume completely independent of the existence of the glance image.
> 
> Do you think we can firstly add this feature to cinder? Do folks have 
any 
> comments on it?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Best wishes,
> Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
> 
> Staff Software Engineer, Open Standards and Open Source Team, Emerging 
> Technology Institute, IBM China Software Development Lab
> 
> Tel: 86-10-82450778 Fax: 86-10-82453660
> Notes ID: Sheng Bo Hou/China/IBM at IBMCN    E-mail: sbhou at cn.ibm.com 
> Address:3F Ring, Building 28 Zhongguancun Software Park, 8 Dongbeiwang 
> West Road, Haidian District, Beijing, P.R.C.100193
> 地址:北京市海淀区东北旺西路8号中关村软件园28号楼环宇大厦3层 邮编:100193

> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


-- 
Mate Lakat

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130622/25137b21/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list