Open Stack

On 06/28/2013 12:18 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> Hey I made the list!
> 
> _https://review.openstack.org/#/c/25355/_
> 
> Just wanted to point out for nova in longest-waiting reviews based on
> first revision:
> 
> 
> 1.        94 days, 12 hours, 49 minutes
> - _https://review.openstack.org/25355_ (PowerVM resize and migrate test
> cases)
> 
> This one is a bit skewed because it was abandoned due to inactivity and
> then I picked it back up by assigning the bug to myself and contributing
> to the original review.
> 
> Is there a way to take that into account in the metrics?  Or is this a
> process issue, i.e. should I have left this abandoned and pushed up a
> new review based on the original?

I think what you did is definitely the right thing to do.  The stat is
still accurate for how long it is taking to get the patch to completion.
 Having some really high numbers here doesn't worry me, because it's
reality, and is often out of the control of reviewers.

-- 
Russell Bryant