[openstack-dev] [Networking] Allocation of IPs

Edgar Magana emagana at plumgrid.com
Fri Jun 28 06:03:00 UTC 2013


Thanks Mark!

Edgar

From:  Mark McClain <mark.mcclain at dreamhost.com>
Reply-To:  OpenStack List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Date:  Monday, June 24, 2013 7:04 AM
To:  OpenStack List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [Networking] Allocation of IPs

Here's the blueprintŠ

https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/configurable-ip-allocation


On Jun 21, 2013, at 5:34 PM, Edgar Magana <emagana at plumgrid.com> wrote:

> Mark,
> 
> Can you point me to the BP for this feature?
> I want to keep an eye on it.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Edgar
> 
> From:  Mark McClain <mark.mcclain at dreamhost.com>
> Reply-To:  OpenStack List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Date:  Friday, June 21, 2013 12:41 PM
> To:  OpenStack List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [Networking] Allocation of IPs
> 
> There will be a deployment option where you can configure the default IP
> allocator.  Additionally, the allocator will be configurable at subnet
> creation time.
> 
> mark
> 
> 
> On Jun 20, 2013, at 4:51 PM, Edgar Magana <emagana at plumgrid.com> wrote:
> 
>> Could it be possible to add a flag to disable the allocation for the IP?
>> If the "no allocation" flag is enabled, all ports will have an empty value
>> for IPs.
>>  It will increase the config parameters in quantum, should we try it?
>> 
>> Edgar
>> 
>> From:  Mark McClain <mark.mcclain at dreamhost.com>
>> Reply-To:  OpenStack List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Date:  Thursday, June 20, 2013 1:13 PM
>> To:  OpenStack List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [Networking] Allocation of IPs
>> 
>> There's work under way to make IP allocation pluggable. One of the options
>> will include not having an allocator for a subnet.
>> 
>> mark
>> 
>> On Jun 20, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Edgar Magana <emagana at plumgrid.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Developers,
>>> 
>>> So far in Networking (formerly Quantum) IPs are pre-allocated when a new
>>> port is created by the following def:
>>> _allocate_ips_for_port(self, context, network, port):
>>> 
>>> If we are using a real DHCP (not the dnsmasq process) that does not accept
>>> static IP allocation because it only allocates IPs based on its own
>>> algorithm, how can we tell Networking to not allocate an IP at all?
>>> I don¹t think that is possible based on the code but I would like to know if
>>> somebody has gone through the same problem and have a workaround solution.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> Edgar
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.orghttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
>> istinfo/openstack-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.orghttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
> stinfo/openstack-dev
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130627/14b2b37a/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list