Open Stack

Monty Taylor wrote:
> I'd actually like to revisit this question as a separate thing.
> Honestly, I want to see bug work and review work as part of the ATC
> calculation. Seriously - both are hard and thankless. I think those are
> really the only two places where work on the above stuff can 'fall
> through the cracks' by potentially not having a 'patch'.

It's worth noting that we already have an corner-case-handling procedure
in the TC charter to catch the improbable case of someone that would
have done bug/review work in the last year but not authored a single
patch. They can still apply for (and be granted) ATC status (see 'Voters
for TC seats ("ATC")' section).

>> * Where would devstack fall ? QA program ? Infrastructure program ?
> 
> I think it's honestly a joint-venture between QA and Infra (especially
> if you consider developer tooling to fall into the infra umbrella -
> which is where it traditionally has fallen) But I'd say it's more
> primarily Infra and we use it for QA, rather than the other way around
> (as someone said the other day - it's devstack, not teststack or
> tempeststack)

Makes sense under Infra, if their main contributors agree.

>> * Where would openstack/requirements fall ?
> 
> I think openstack/requirements sits under oslo - although right now it's
> a joint-venture between oslo and infra.

Oslo++

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)