Open Stack

On Wed, Jun 19 2013, Thierry Carrez wrote:

Hi,

[…]

> This also encourages people to set a target milestone, which is pretty
> essential in communicating out when a given feature is likely to land.

Which have been the most common problem Ceilometer had for the Havana
serie. People don't set milestones.

> So this simplifies a lot, but we lose /some/ granularity:
>
> * You won't have blueprints on your roadmap that are not targeted to a
> specific milestone, so it's more difficult to do a list of "would be
> great to have in this release if only someone wanted to take them"
> blueprints.

We tried that, but that didn't work. Nobody took the blueprints. :-)

> Thoughts ?

That sounds like a good simplification, I'm all for it.

-- 
Julien Danjou
// Free Software hacker / freelance consultant
// http://julien.danjou.info
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130619/011df1e3/attachment.pgp>