[openstack-dev] [Quantum] REST-based ML2 MechanismDriver
Eugene Nikanorov
enikanorov at mirantis.com
Thu Jun 6 14:29:17 UTC 2013
You may try:
.venv/bin/python run_tests.py quantum.tests.unit.ml2.test_
ml2_plugin:TestMl2NetworksV2
Thanks,
Eugene.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Luke Gorrie <luke at snabb.co> wrote:
> Hi Kyle & all,
>
> I am trying to run the Ml2 unit tests in order to get started with
> hacking. Can someone tell me the best way please?
>
> This is what I am trying:
>
> # ./run_tests.sh -P
> quantum.tests.unit.ml2.test_ml2_plugin:TestMl2NetworksV2
> Running `tools/with_venv.sh python setup.py testr --slowest
> --testr-args='--subunit
> quantum.tests.unit.ml2.test_ml2_plugin:TestMl2NetworksV2'`
> invalid command name
> 'quantum.tests.unit.ml2.test_ml2_plugin:TestMl2NetworksV2'
>
> I don't understand that error. I seem to have the same error if I try to
> run the BigSwitch plugin tests too, though that was working for me in the
> Grizzly release, so perhaps run_tests.sh doesn't expect a test name/regex
> as argument anymore?
>
> Any help appreciated :)
> -Luke
>
>
>
>
> On 5 June 2013 15:44, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) <kmestery at cisco.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 5, 2013, at 5:11 AM, Luke Gorrie <luke at tail-f.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Howdy!
>> >
>> > Great work Bob & all on getting the ML2 plugin code onto master,
>> exciting stuff :-)))
>> >
>> > I want to use the upcoming ML2 MechanismDriver to make REST requests to
>> an external system. Is anybody else interested in this too and planning
>> related work? If so then perhaps we could join forces.
>> >
>> > I am flexible with respect to the exact REST API design. In principle I
>> would favor something as close as possible to the raw MechanismDriver API.
>> >
>> > I am doing this work to integrate with the Tail-f Network Control
>> System (NCS). The blueprint for this work was approved this morning for
>> Havana. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/tailf-ncs
>> >
>> > NCS will be customized to support the REST API that we develop on the
>> OpenStack side. So there are no legacy/compatibility constraints on how the
>> REST API needs to look from my perspective.
>> >
>> > I am guessing that the maintainers of the BigSwitch plugin would be
>> interested, being as that is also REST-based and may want to be updated to
>> fit into ML2?
>> >
>> > So please give me a ping if you are interested in MechanismDriver+REST,
>> or point me at where I can find people who are :-)
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > -Luke
>> >
>> Hi Luke, Bob is organizing some sub team meetings around ML2 going
>> forward, we'll be sure to include you in those! Right now, there are 4
>> blueprints open for continued ML2 work. I'm not aware of anyone doing a
>> controller MechanismDriver yet, so you may have just signed up to be the
>> first!
>>
>> Looking forward to having you a part of the ML2 team!
>>
>> Kyle
>>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130606/9ae767c5/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list