[openstack-dev] [Openstack] [cinder] Proposal for Ollie Leahy to join cinder-core

Martin, Kurt Frederick (ESSN Storage MSDU) kurt.f.martin at hp.com
Thu Jul 18 15:20:25 UTC 2013


+1

From: ZG Niu [mailto:niu.zglinux at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 12:00 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [cinder] Proposal for Ollie Leahy to join cinder-core

+1

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Phillip Pao <paophillip at gmail.com<mailto:paophillip at gmail.com>> wrote:
+1

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Qing He <Qing.He at radisys.com<mailto:Qing.He at radisys.com>> wrote:
+1

From: Huang Zhiteng [mailto:winston.d at gmail.com<mailto:winston.d at gmail.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 2:56 PM

To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [cinder] Proposal for Ollie Leahy to join cinder-core

+1 for Ollie.

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Avishay Traeger <AVISHAY at il.ibm.com<mailto:AVISHAY at il.ibm.com>> wrote:
"Walter A. Boring IV" <walter.boring at hp.com<mailto:walter.boring at hp.com>> wrote on 07/18/2013 12:04:07
AM:
<snip>
> +1 to Ollie from me.
>
> +1 to John's points.   If a company is colluding with other core
> members, from the same company, to do bad things within a project,
> it should become pretty obvious at some point and the project's
> community should take action.   If someone is putting in an extra
> effort to provide quality code and reviews on a regular basis, then
> why wouldn't we want that person on the team?  Besides, being a core
> member really just means that you are required to do reviews and
> help out with the community.  You do get some gerrit privileges for
> reviews, but that's about it.   I for one think that we absolutely
> can use more core members to help out with reviews during the
> milestone deadlines :)
Walt,
As I said, I really wasn't worried about anyone colluding or doing bad
things.  As you said, that would be obvious and could be handled.  I was
concerned about creating a limited view, and I thank you and everyone who
replied for easing those concerns.

And BTW, I don't think there is an HP conspiracy to take over Cinder and
make it FC-only :)

Thanks,
Avishay


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



--
Regards
Huang Zhiteng

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



--
Best Regards,
NiuZG
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130718/ecdf2b72/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list