Open Stack

+1 for Ollie.


On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Avishay Traeger <AVISHAY at il.ibm.com> wrote:

> "Walter A. Boring IV" <walter.boring at hp.com> wrote on 07/18/2013 12:04:07
> AM:
> <snip>
> > +1 to Ollie from me.
> >
> > +1 to John's points.   If a company is colluding with other core
> > members, from the same company, to do bad things within a project,
> > it should become pretty obvious at some point and the project's
> > community should take action.   If someone is putting in an extra
> > effort to provide quality code and reviews on a regular basis, then
> > why wouldn't we want that person on the team?  Besides, being a core
> > member really just means that you are required to do reviews and
> > help out with the community.  You do get some gerrit privileges for
> > reviews, but that's about it.   I for one think that we absolutely
> > can use more core members to help out with reviews during the
> > milestone deadlines :)
>
> Walt,
> As I said, I really wasn't worried about anyone colluding or doing bad
> things.  As you said, that would be obvious and could be handled.  I was
> concerned about creating a limited view, and I thank you and everyone who
> replied for easing those concerns.
>
> And BTW, I don't think there is an HP conspiracy to take over Cinder and
> make it FC-only :)
>
> Thanks,
> Avishay
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Regards
Huang Zhiteng
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130717/21eb03f1/attachment.html>