Open Stack

Thanks, Nachi.

Doug


On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Nachi Ueno <nachi at ntti3.com> wrote:

> Hi Folks
>
> Thanks
> I'll update code with Jinja2
>
> 2013/7/16 Michael Basnight <mbasnight at gmail.com>:
> > Also, jinja2 is in requirements. We have no specific requirements on a
> particular version so feel free to pin it to a specific. We (trove) use it
> to generate config templates.
> >
> >
> https://github.com/openstack/requirements/commit/96f38365ce94d2135f7744c93bae0ce92a747195
> >
> > On Jul 16, 2013, at 1:10 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
> >
> >> Hi folks
> >>
> >> Jinja2 looks have +3.
> >> This is the winner?
> >>
> >> # My code can be done by Jinja2 also.
> >>
> >> so if we choose Jinja2, what's version range is needed?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Nachi
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2013/7/16 Matt Dietz <matt.dietz at rackspace.com>:
> >>> I'll second the jinja2 recommendation. I also use it with Pyramid, and
> >>> find it non-obtrusive to write and easy to understand.
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Sandy Walsh <sandy.walsh at RACKSPACE.COM>
> >>> Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
> >>> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> >>> Date: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 11:34 AM
> >>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> >>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Cheetah vs Jinja
> >>>
> >>>> I've used jinja2 on many projects ... it's always been solid.
> >>>>
> >>>> -S
> >>>>
> >>>> ________________________________________
> >>>> From: Solly Ross [sross at redhat.com]
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 10:41 AM
> >>>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
> >>>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Change I30b127d6] Cheetah vs Jinja
> >>>>
> >>>> (This email is with regards to
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/36316/)
> >>>>
> >>>> Hello All,
> >>>>
> >>>> I have been implementing the Guru Meditation Report blueprint
> >>>> (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo/+spec/guru-meditation-report),
> and
> >>>> the question of a templating engine was raised.  Currently, my
> version of
> >>>> the code includes the Jinja2 templating engine (
> http://jinja.pocoo.org/),
> >>>> which is modeled after the Django templating engine (it was designed
> to
> >>>> be an implementation of the Django templating engine without requiring
> >>>> the use of Django), which is used in Horizon.  Apparently, the Cheetah
> >>>> templating engine (http://www.cheetahtemplate.org/) is used in a
> couple
> >>>> places in Nova.
> >>>>
> >>>> IMO, the Jinja template language produces much more readable
> templates,
> >>>> and I think is the better choice for inclusion in the Report
> framework.
> >>>> It also shares a common format with Django (making it slightly easier
> to
> >>>> write for people coming from that area), and is also similar to
> template
> >>>> engines for other languages. What does everyone else think?
> >>>>
> >>>> Best Regards,
> >>>> Solly Ross
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130716/f1acf544/attachment.html>