Open Stack

Dolph Mathews wrote:
> On Monday, July 15, 2013, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>>     I'd generally agree with that. The only issue with devstack is that
>>     under the old project-based taxonomy it was classified as a "gating"
>>     project and therefore granted ATC status to its contributors. Under the
>>     new program-based taxonomy, if it's not adopted by a program then it
>>     would fall off the "official" ATC scope.
> 
> How many people contribute to devstack that don't also contribute to
> some other ATC-granting project?

Hopefully none :) But it's not just a question of falling off the
ATC-granting scope... it's also that devstack is a critical piece of our
CI system and I'd therefore prefer if it was taken care of by a team (or
set of teams) under the Technical Committee authority.

It used to be a project separate from "OpenStack" but we brought it to
the fold for that precise reason.

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)