Open Stack

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 13:18 +0400, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
> > Mark, John, Nikola,
> >
> >
> > Current in oslo we would like to put only 2 functions:
> >
> > 1) generic method for creating shadow table
> > 2) generic method that the columns are same in shadow and main table
> >
> >
> > So migration that adds shadow table could be done after all other
> > works, when we finish improving of db-archiving utils (that moves
> > deleted rows to shadow tables), to avoid problems that noticed
> > Nikola.
> >
> >
> > These 2 functions won't be affected and will be used in future in
> > cinder, glance and they are already used in Nova. So I don't see any
> > problem to push it into oslo at this moment.
>
> It's not clear to me that Cinder or Glance are planning to use these in
> the Havana cycle.
>
> From afar, they both sound like they are part of the current Nova DB
> archiving strategy that we're saying needs improvement before it is
> adopted by other projects.
>
That seems pretty accurate regarding my viewpoint.

>
> Cheers,
> Mark.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130711/b69d158d/attachment.html>