Open Stack

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Monty Taylor <mordred at inaugust.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 07/09/2013 11:43 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 11:39 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >>         Hey
> >>
> >>         The mission statement is what we've been using for a while. The
> >>         "official title" is new.
> >>
> >>           Official Title: OpenStack Common Libraries
> >>           PTL: Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com>
> >>           Mission Statement:
> >>             To produce a set of python libraries containing
> infrastructure code
> >>             shared by OpenStack projects. The APIs provided by these
> libraries
> >>             should be high quality, stable, consistent and generally
> applicable.
> >>
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >>
> >> What sort of code would not be "infrastructure" but would be "shared
> >> by OpenStack projects"? Is the "infrastructure" redundant?
> >
> > Simply saying "code" isn't enterprisey enough
> >
> > (Point taken, removed :)
>
>
> Can you add synergy?
>

+1 for renaming 'oslo' to 'synergism'


>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 

-Dolph
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130709/7a1f0423/attachment.html>