Open Stack

At Monty's suggestion, I have submitted new changes to Cinder, Nova, and
Oslo to allow WebOb to be >=1.0.8 as a temporary measure to avoid the
conflicts.

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/19103/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/19104/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/19105/

There's a change proposed for Glance to move to ==1.2.3 (
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/18038/3) so we either need that to go in
or to make a similar "relaxing" change first and then move to 1.2.3.

Doug

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Doug Hellmann
<doug.hellmann at dreamhost.com>wrote:

> It looks like these changes have gone into Quantum and Keystone. That
> leaves Glance, Nova, Cinder, and Oslo.
>
> The gating tests for Cinder are failing because of the version conflicts
> between some of the projects now. I expect the same issue to come up for
> Nova, when that patch is approved. Is there a procedure for bypassing those
> tests or otherwise getting past the fact that one project can't merge the
> change until they all do?
>
> Doug
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Doug Hellmann <doug.hellmann at dreamhost.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Sascha Peilicke <saschpe at suse.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Am 3. Januar 2013 19:34:46 schrieb Doug Hellmann <
>>> doug.hellmann at dreamhost.com>:
>>>
>>>  Sure; I'm not sure why my grep didn't find that use.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Doug,
>>>
>>> I did most of those and I'll have a look at the other OpenStack
>>> components soon. We run all testsuites against openSUSE:Factory packages,
>>> which are always the latest and greatest. However, no issues with a newer
>>> WebOb popped up so far. So either the coverage isnt't sufficient or its
>>> working already ;-)
>>
>>
>> Thanks, Sascha! Let me know if you run into any issues, please.
>>
>> Doug
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Doug
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Brian Waldon <bcwaldon at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Webob is being used in Glance as well. There have been some patches to
>>>> > prepare the code for webob 1.2.1, but we're still depending on 1.0.8.
>>>> Would
>>>> > you mind taking a look?
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Jan 3, 2013, at 8:32 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > The ceilometer team is using Pecan [1] for our next-generation API
>>>> > framework. Pecan depends on a newer WebOb than is used by the other
>>>> > OpenStack components, so I spent this morning reviewing the
>>>> differences in
>>>> > WebOb between 1.0.8 and 1.2.3 (the latest stable release) [2] and what
>>>> > impact those changes might have on nova, cinder, keystone, and oslo
>>>> (the 4
>>>> > projects where I found WebOb being used -- please let me know if I
>>>> missed
>>>> > one).
>>>> >
>>>> > Most of the changes appear to be bug fixes and changes that either
>>>> have a
>>>> > backwards-compatible alias, are deprecations that were reversed
>>>> later, or
>>>> > should not have an impact on us because we were not using the changed
>>>> area
>>>> > of the code directly. The only thing I found to be questionable is the
>>>> > change to Request.path_info and Request.script_name. Those properties
>>>> are
>>>> > now unicode objects instead of str objects, as WebOb is trying to
>>>> provide
>>>> > better Python 3 support. I found a few uses of those variables in
>>>> > comparisons and concatenation with str objects, but the casting
>>>> should work
>>>> > automatically as long as the path can be encoded in the default
>>>> encoding,
>>>> > which should be the case as the paths to our API use only ASCII
>>>> characters.
>>>> > All of the unit tests pass when I run them locally.
>>>> >
>>>> > I have submitted patches against the 4 projects to update the version
>>>> > number in tools/pip-requires, without any other code changes:
>>>> >
>>>> > Oslo: https://review.openstack.org/#**/c/18885/<https://review.openstack.org/#/c/18885/>
>>>> > Nova: https://review.openstack.org/#**/c/18886/<https://review.openstack.org/#/c/18886/>
>>>> > Keystone: https://review.openstack.org/#**/c/18887/<https://review.openstack.org/#/c/18887/>
>>>> > Cinder: https://review.openstack.org/#**/c/18888/<https://review.openstack.org/#/c/18888/>
>>>> >
>>>> > If anyone else has done similar analysis in the past and come to a
>>>> > different conclusion about whether it is safe to upgrade, please let
>>>> me
>>>> > know.
>>>> >
>>>> > Doug
>>>> >
>>>> > [1] Pecan: http://pecan.readthedocs.org/**en/latest/<http://pecan.readthedocs.org/en/latest/>
>>>> > [2] The full release notes for WebOb:
>>>> > http://docs.webob.org/en/**latest/news.html<http://docs.webob.org/en/latest/news.html>
>>>> >
>>>> > ______________________________**_________________
>>>> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.**org<OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>>>> > http://lists.openstack.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**openstack-dev<http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > ______________________________**_________________
>>>> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.**org<OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>>>> > http://lists.openstack.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**openstack-dev<http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>> --
>>> With kind regards,
>>> Sascha Peilicke
>>> SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg, Germany
>>> GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130107/7120b858/attachment.html>