Open Stack

On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 20:00 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 02/15/2013 07:07 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > Usually, we avoid breaking existing configurations. But, in the case of
> > hyper-v, I'd be fine with you guys saying "we did't have many users in
> > Folsom, so backwards compat isn't a big concern".
> 
> I would agree too, on this case only ... :)
> 
> Please don't propose to move *other* directives around on new sections.
> It's too late for that already.

Already proposed and there was consensus that it was a good idea:

https://etherpad.openstack.org/grizzly-nova-config-options

We'll retain backwards compatibility support for at least a release,
though.

Cheers,
Mark.