On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Nadya Privalova <nprivalova at mirantis.com>wrote: > Hello guys! > > I hope all of you are enjoying the holidays! But I'd like to raise a > Tempest question. Again. I hope this email will not be lost after vacations > :) > After the summit we decided to track all tests that are being created for > Ceilometer in Tempest here: > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/add-basic-ceilometer-tests. > Besides, we've created an etherpad page with a test plan > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ceilometer-test-plan. > > But it turned out that it works very bad. Now we have at least 3 change > requests that have common functionality implemented. So we definitely need > more reliable mechanism for tracking any changes. > That's why I suggest to create a separate blueprint for each > functionality. E.g. "Ceilometer client for Tempest", "Notification testing" > with several bps that depend on it ("Swift notifications", "Glance > notifications", "Nova notifications") and so on. In future we may vary the > detail level of blueprints but now we need very detailed ones because > different people have started to work on e.g. notifications. > So there are the following action items: > 1. Resolve all conflicts in changes that are on review now (see my comment > to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39237/ patch set 21 for more details) > 2. Create set of blueprints from the testplan we have > 3. Add Tempest discussions to Ceilometer weekly meeting agenda (done) > > So you might want to consider setting up something like this: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmYuZ6T4IJETdEVNTWlYVUVOWURmOERSZ0VGc1BBQWc&usp=drive_web#gid=0 which was done for the Nova API testing where we have lots of people working on tests simultaneously but don't want people accidentally duplicating effort. Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131228/9c294fd8/attachment.html>