Open Stack

On 17/12/13 11:54 +0100, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
>On 2013/16/12 15:19, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>>1. Programs that are not part of OpenStack's release cycle shouldn't
>>be considered official nor they should have the rights that integrated
>>projects have.
>I don't agree on this point. There might be supportive teams, which 
>are helping OpenStack in general (like UX) and they are not exactly 
>part of release cycles. Why should this team and effort be excluded 
>from official recognition?

They do receive recognition. Infrastructure, Documentation, Release
Management. Those are programs that don't have actual projects but are
critical for OpenStack's releases.

It's a matter of just labeling the program as official. My point there
is about Programs that just have a non integrated project under their
umbrella.

Cheers,
FF


>
>-- Jarda
>
>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-- 
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131217/bc67e06f/attachment.pgp>