Mathieu, Here are my results for running the unit tests for the agents. I ran `tox -e cover neutron.tests.unit.openvswitch.test_ovs_neutron_agent` at 3b4233873539bad62d202025529678a5b0add412 with the following result: Name Stmts Miss Branch BrMiss Cover … neutron/plugins/openvswitch/agent/ovs_neutron_agent 639 257 237 123 57% … and `tox -e cover neutron.tests.unit.linuxbridge.test_lb_neutron_agent` with the following result: ... neutron/plugins/linuxbridge/agent/linuxbridge_neutron_agent 607 134 255 73 76% ... Amir On Dec 11, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Mathieu Rohon <mathieu.rohon at gmail.com> wrote: > the coverage is quite good on the ML2 plugin. > it looks like the biggest effort should be done on the ovs and lb agents, no? > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Amir Sadoughi > <amir.sadoughi at rackspace.com> wrote: >> From today’s ML2 meeting, I had an action item to produce coverage report >> for ML2 unit tests. >> >> Here is the command line output of the tests and report I produced: >> >> http://paste.openstack.org/show/54845/ >> >> Amir Sadoughi >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev