[openstack-dev] Neutron Distributed Virtual Router

Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville) swaminathan.vasudevan at hp.com
Tue Dec 10 22:16:07 UTC 2013


Hi Nachi,
Yes you are right, NSX deals with (local or distributed) routers and Service Routers.
Thanks
Swami


>Hi Yong



>NSX have two kind of router.

>Edge and distributed router.



>Edge node will work as some VPN services and advanced service nodes.



>Actually, VPNaaS OSS impl is running in l3-agent.

>so IMO, we need l3-agent also for basis of some edge services.











2013/12/9 Yongsheng Gong <gong... at unitedstack.com>:

> If distributed router is good enough, why do we still need non-distributed

> router?

>

>

> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Ian Wells <ijw.ubu... at cack.org.uk> wrote:

>>

>> I would imagine that, from the Neutron perspective, you get a single

>> router whether or not it's distributed.  I think that if a router is

>> distributed - regardless of whether it's tenant-tenant or tenant-outside -

>> it certainly *could* have some sort of SLA flag, but I don't think a simple

>> 'distributed' flag is either here or there; it's not telling the tenant

>> anything meaningful.

>>

>>

>> On 10 December 2013 00:48, Mike Wilson <geekinu... at gmail.com> wrote:

>>>

>>> I guess the question that immediately comes to mind is, is there anyone

>>> that doesn't want a distributed router? I guess there could be someone out

>>> there that hates the idea of traffic flowing in a balanced fashion, but

>>> can't they just run a single router then? Does there really need to be some

>>> flag to disable/enable this behavior? Maybe I am oversimplifying things...

>>> you tell me.

>>>

>>> -Mike Wilson

>>>

>>>

>>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville)

>>> <swaminathan.vasude... at hp.com> wrote:

>>>>

>>>> Hi Folks,

>>>>

>>>> We are in the process of defining the API for the Neutron Distributed

>>>> Virtual Router, and we have a question.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Just wanted to get the feedback from the community before we implement

>>>> and post for review.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> We are planning to use the "distributed" flag for the routers that are

>>>> supposed to be routing traffic locally (both East West and North South).

>>>>

>>>> This "distributed" flag is already there in the "neutronclient" API, but

>>>> currently only utilized by the "Nicira Plugin".

>>>>

>>>> We would like to go ahead and use the same "distributed" flag and add an

>>>> extension to the router table to accommodate the "distributed flag".

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Please let us know your feedback.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Thanks.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Swaminathan Vasudevan

>>>>

>>>> Systems Software Engineer (TC)

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> HP Networking

>>>>

>>>> Hewlett-Packard

>>>>

>>>> 8000 Foothills Blvd

>>>>

>>>> M/S 5541

>>>>

>>>> Roseville, CA - 95747

>>>>

>>>> tel: 916.785.0937

>>>>

>>>> fax: 916.785.1815

>>>>

>>>> email: swaminathan.vasude... at hp.com

>>>>


Swaminathan Vasudevan
Systems Software Engineer (TC)


HP Networking
Hewlett-Packard
8000 Foothills Blvd
M/S 5541
Roseville, CA - 95747
tel: 916.785.0937
fax: 916.785.1815
email: swaminathan.vasudevan at hp.com<mailto:swaminathan.vasudevan at hp.com>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131210/1607468a/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list