[openstack-dev] Neutron Distributed Virtual Router
Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville)
swaminathan.vasudevan at hp.com
Tue Dec 10 22:16:07 UTC 2013
Hi Nachi,
Yes you are right, NSX deals with (local or distributed) routers and Service Routers.
Thanks
Swami
>Hi Yong
>NSX have two kind of router.
>Edge and distributed router.
>Edge node will work as some VPN services and advanced service nodes.
>Actually, VPNaaS OSS impl is running in l3-agent.
>so IMO, we need l3-agent also for basis of some edge services.
2013/12/9 Yongsheng Gong <gong... at unitedstack.com>:
> If distributed router is good enough, why do we still need non-distributed
> router?
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Ian Wells <ijw.ubu... at cack.org.uk> wrote:
>>
>> I would imagine that, from the Neutron perspective, you get a single
>> router whether or not it's distributed. I think that if a router is
>> distributed - regardless of whether it's tenant-tenant or tenant-outside -
>> it certainly *could* have some sort of SLA flag, but I don't think a simple
>> 'distributed' flag is either here or there; it's not telling the tenant
>> anything meaningful.
>>
>>
>> On 10 December 2013 00:48, Mike Wilson <geekinu... at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I guess the question that immediately comes to mind is, is there anyone
>>> that doesn't want a distributed router? I guess there could be someone out
>>> there that hates the idea of traffic flowing in a balanced fashion, but
>>> can't they just run a single router then? Does there really need to be some
>>> flag to disable/enable this behavior? Maybe I am oversimplifying things...
>>> you tell me.
>>>
>>> -Mike Wilson
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville)
>>> <swaminathan.vasude... at hp.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Folks,
>>>>
>>>> We are in the process of defining the API for the Neutron Distributed
>>>> Virtual Router, and we have a question.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Just wanted to get the feedback from the community before we implement
>>>> and post for review.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We are planning to use the "distributed" flag for the routers that are
>>>> supposed to be routing traffic locally (both East West and North South).
>>>>
>>>> This "distributed" flag is already there in the "neutronclient" API, but
>>>> currently only utilized by the "Nicira Plugin".
>>>>
>>>> We would like to go ahead and use the same "distributed" flag and add an
>>>> extension to the router table to accommodate the "distributed flag".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please let us know your feedback.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Swaminathan Vasudevan
>>>>
>>>> Systems Software Engineer (TC)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> HP Networking
>>>>
>>>> Hewlett-Packard
>>>>
>>>> 8000 Foothills Blvd
>>>>
>>>> M/S 5541
>>>>
>>>> Roseville, CA - 95747
>>>>
>>>> tel: 916.785.0937
>>>>
>>>> fax: 916.785.1815
>>>>
>>>> email: swaminathan.vasude... at hp.com
>>>>
Swaminathan Vasudevan
Systems Software Engineer (TC)
HP Networking
Hewlett-Packard
8000 Foothills Blvd
M/S 5541
Roseville, CA - 95747
tel: 916.785.0937
fax: 916.785.1815
email: swaminathan.vasudevan at hp.com<mailto:swaminathan.vasudevan at hp.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131210/1607468a/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list