Open Stack

+1 ! I'll join.
I'm also working on investigating how to use openstack gating system.
(This document is still draft version)
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1WJInaSt_H2kVkjnhtPmiATP1F-0BVbuk1eefQalL5Q0/edit#slide=id.p

2013/12/10 Ivar Lazzaro <ivar at embrane.com>:
> +1 for 1700UTC Thursday on IRC
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mestery at siliconloons.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 9:21 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Third party Neutron plugin testing meeting
>
> On Dec 10, 2013, at 10:45 AM, "Veiga, Anthony" <Anthony_Veiga at cable.comcast.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kyle Mestery <mestery at siliconloons.com>
>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Date: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 10:48
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Third party Neutron plugin testing
>> meeting
>>
>>> Last week I took an action item to organize a meeting for everyone
>>> who is doing third-party testing in Neutron for plugins, whether this
>>> is vendor or Open Source based. The idea is to share ideas around
>>> setups and any issues people hit. I'd like to set this meeting up for
>>> this week, Thursday at 1700UTC. I would also like to propose we make
>>> this a dial in meeting using the Infrastructure Conferencing bridges
>>> [1]. If this time works, I'll set something up and reply to this
>>> thread with the dial in information.
>>
>> +1 for the meeting time.  Any particular reason for voice over IRC?
>>
> We kind of decided that doing this over voice initially would be expedient, but I am fine with moving to IRC. If I don't hear objections, lets assume we will meet at 1700UTC Thursday on #openstack-meeting-alt.
>
>
>>>
>>> Also, I've started a etherpad page [2] with information. It would be
>>> good for people to add information to this etherpad as well. I've
>>> coupled this pad with information around multi-node gate testing for
>>> Neutron as well, as I suspect most of the third-party testing will
>>> require multiple nodes as well.
>>
>> I'll start filling out our setup.  I have some questions around
>> Third-Party Testing in particular, and look forward to this discussion.
>>
> Awesome, thanks Anthony!
>
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Kyle
>>>
>>> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Conferencing
>>> [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/multi-node-neutron-tempest
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev