[openstack-dev] [Neutron] DHCP Agent Reliability

Isaku Yamahata isaku.yamahata at gmail.com
Mon Dec 9 11:07:12 UTC 2013


On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:43:59AM +1300,
Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote:

> On 9 December 2013 01:43, Maru Newby <marun at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> 
> >>> If AMQP service is set up not to lose notification, notifications will be piled up
> >>> and stress AMQP service. I would say single node failure isn't catastrophic.
> >>
> >> So we should have AMQP set to discard notifications if there is noone
> >
> > What are the semantics of AMQP discarding notifications when a consumer is no longer present?  Can this be relied upon to ensure that potentially stale notifications do not remain in the queue when an agent restarts?
> 
> If the queue is set to autodelete, it will delete when the agent
> disconnects. There will be no queue until the agent reconnects. I
> don't know if we expose that functionality via oslo.messaging, but
> it's certainly something AMQP can do.

What happens if intermittent network instability occur?
When the connection between agent <-> AMQP is unintentionally closed,
will agent die or reconnect to it?
-- 
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata at gmail.com>



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list