Open Stack

Sure, no one has said it. But it seems to be implied, otherwise these
types of discussions wouldn't occur. Right?

On 12/3/13 2:25 PM, "Mark McLoughlin" <markmc at redhat.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 22:07 +0000, Joshua Harlow wrote:
>
>> Process for process sake imho has been a problem for oslo.
>
>It's been reiterated many times, but again - the only purpose of
>oslo-incubator is as a place to evolve an API until we're ready to make
>a commitment to API stability.
>
>It's often easier to start a new API completely standalone, push it to
>PyPI and plan for API backwards compatibility from the start. No-one has
>ever said that such APIs need to go through oslo-incubator "for process
>sake".
>
>Mark.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev