Open Stack

Shrinking that rotation granularity would be reasonable to. Rotate once every 2 weeks or some other time period still seems useful to me.

Sent from my really tiny device...

On Aug 28, 2013, at 3:43 AM, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:29:23PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote:
>> On 28 August 2013 21:13, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 03:43:21AM +0000, Joshua Harlow wrote:
>> 
>>>> For a big project like nova the workload could be spread out more
>>>> like that.
>>> 
>>> I don't think any kind of rotation system like that is really
>>> practical. Core team members need to have the flexibility to balance
>>> their various conflicting workloads in a way that maximises their
>>> own productivity.
>> 
>> So does everyone else, surely? Are you saying 'I don't think I can
>> commit to regular reviewing', or are you saying 'all reviewers will be
>> unable to commit to regular reviewing'? Or something else?
> 
> No, IIUC, Joshua was suggesting that core team members spend one cycle
> doing reviews only, with no coding, and then reverse for the next cycle. 
> That is just far too coarse/crude. Core team members need to be free to
> balance their time between reviews and coding work on an ongoing basis,
> just as any other member of the community can.
> 
> Regards,
> Daniel
> -- 
> |: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
> |: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
> |: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
> |: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev