Open Stack

Hi Salvatore

Thank you for your comment.
I'm adding OpenSwan support as additional driver, so it is safe for strongswan.

Best
Nachi

2013/8/19 Salvatore Orlando <sorlando at nicira.com>:
> As I said during the meeting, I am happy to support both as long as the code
> churn is reasonably contained and the chances of strongswan support
> introducing bugs into openswan driver are negligible.
>
> Openswan should be the default solution, in muy opinion.
>
> Salvatore
>
>
> On 20 August 2013 00:15, Nachi Ueno <nachi at ntti3.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks
>>
>> I would like to discuss whether supporting OpenSwan or StrongSwan or Both
>> for
>> ipsec driver?
>>
>> We choose StrongSwan because of the community is active and plenty of
>> docs.
>> However It looks like RHEL is only supporting OpenSwan.
>>
>> so we should choose
>>
>> (A) Support StrongSwan
>> (B) Support OpenSwan
>> (C) Support both
>>    (C-1) Make StrongSwan default
>>    (C-2) Make OpenSwan default
>>
>> Actually, I'm working on C-2.
>> The patch is still WIP https://review.openstack.org/#/c/42264/
>>
>> Besides the patch is small, supporting two driver may burden
>> in H3 including docs or additional help.
>> IMO, this is also a valid comment.
>>
>> Best
>> Nachi
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>