Open Stack

On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>wrote:

> Anne Gentle wrote:
> > Let me know your input on "continuous release with bug tracking" for the
> > guides in the list above. If you have additional ideas, I'd love to hear
> > them. I'm definitely pondering the integrated programs doc strategies
> > and open to ideas. We've been discussing on openstack-docs but want to
> > bring the discussion to a larger group so please reply to openstack-dev.
>
> I think it makes sense, especially in a world where the actual code you
> run may or may not be aligned with a "release" anyway. It's better than
> the previous situation, where guides were "released" a few weeks after
> the "release", creating a lot of confusion. Better designate a set that
> you release together with the release and go continuous for the others.
>
>
Thanks for the input! I've looked at the analytics data and nearly 1/4th of
visitors are going to the /trunk/ docs anyway, which change continuously
now. So I think a smaller "release" set of docs is the way to go.

Thanks,

Anne


> So +1 from me!
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130812/489c3937/attachment.html>