Open Stack

Monty Taylor wrote:
> What if instead we had a repo with a bunch of ReStructureText in it -
> perhaps a copy of the TC charter and then a dir for additional things
> the TC has decided. That repo would be autopublished to a non-wiki
> website ... and the core team for the repo was the TC. EXCEPT, we didnt'
> do a 2 core +2 thing ... we'd have some slightly different rules. Such
> as - certain number of days it has to be open, certain number of +1
> votes, etc. And then only the TC chair has the actual APRV vote, which
> is used to codify the vote tallies.

I think that's a great idea, tracking revisions of proposed motions and
recording of the results/votes is not so great at this point. I would
still prefer to use the ML and the meeting to *discuss* the motion, but
tracking wording changes and approvals should be made easier.

A few questions:
* Chair can use APRV once the vote is over to indicate YES wins... how
to indicate that the vote is over and NO won ? Abandon the review ?
* How do we handle proxies ? Giving temporary +2 to a non-TC member
sounds like a bit of pain

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)