[openstack-dev] [OSLO][RPC] AMQP / ZeroMQ control_exchange vs port numbers

Mark McLoughlin markmc at redhat.com
Mon Apr 29 16:18:47 UTC 2013


On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 12:00 -0400, Eric Windisch wrote:
> > > 
> > > But if we allow all of these options to be specified in a URL,
> > > ceilometer can just have:
> > > 
> > > glance_transport = kombu://me:secret@foobar:3232//glance/notifications
> > > 
> > > rather than just:
> > > 
> > > glance_control_exchange = 'glance'
> > > 
> > > and can easily support exchanges being on different brokers. Right?
> > 
> > Yes, please! :-)
> > 
> 
> +1 
> 
> As long as this won't lead to someone hard-coding the scheme.
> 
> I think the host portion would actually be the *listening* address /
> interface for ZeroMQ, which might be odd?

I guess the semantics of the URL are transport specific, so they can be
as odd as you like. Alternatively, just make it a query parameter.

Cheers,
Mark.




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list