Open Stack

Yes, I've seen this other thread on the stackforge repo, which is
definitely the right way; the currently multiple personal repos are
confusing.
With my last message I was more trying to point to the discussion on
etherpad. My assumption was that this is still the place for discussing and
asking questions. And then the complete samples would go to the stackforge
repo.

> From: Steven Hardy <shardy at redhat.com>
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
<openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>,
> Date: 24.04.2013 14:29
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Future Vision for Heat   // DSL
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 07:02:47PM +0200, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > thanks for setting this up. So does everyone agree that this will be
the
> > master repository?
>
> Seems fine for initial prototyping, but see my thread[1] discussing a
> stackforge "official" Heat repo of sample templates (and associated
> image-building templates)
>
> The idea is that we (as a project) maintain a set of example templates
> which we've reviewed, hopefully tested a bit and expect to work (like we
> currently do in-tree with the CFN example templates)
>
> I'm very keen to move away from any project dependency on personal github
> repos, and also to standardize our review process for code & templates
>
> Thanks though Alex for getting the ball rolling, we can easily push
content
> from your repo to the stackforge repo once I've got it set up :)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Steve
>
> [1]
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-April/007781.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>