Open Stack

> Why don't we get this into Oslo and at least make an attempt at driving
the car in the same direction?

I'm not sure that putting either into Oslo is the right solution, but
add-ons/hooks that seem to be pretty common would be OK.


> However, the existing WSGI code in our projects isn't going away any
> time soon and continues to evolve. I think there'd be huge value in
> someone incrementally consolidating those WSGI implementations, bit by
> bit.

As I mentioned at the summit, we ended up doing Falcon because Pecan and
Flask were too slow for a chatty data API. That being said, Pecan does
some nice things for you, and is probably fast enough for management APIs.
If we could standardize on a couple frameworks, that may be Good Enough.

@kgriffs