Open Stack

This project (Falcon) is only about 4 months old. While it looks to be
good solid code, it would be great if OpenStack projects could settle on
a WSGI framework and everyone work towards the same end goal. By my
count, to date OpenStack projects have used Bottle, Flask, Pecan, WSME,
and custom-built frameworks.

Why don't we get this into Oslo and at least make an attempt at driving
the car in the same direction? If the performance benefits of Falcon are
as advertised, I would think the OpenStack dev community would be eager
to create a simple Oslo wrapper around the Falcon library and start to
standardize on a single framework for WSGI handling.

Best,
-jay

On 04/23/2013 07:02 AM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
> haha ... classic case of left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing. 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -S
> ________________________________________
> From: Thierry Carrez [thierry at openstack.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 6:20 AM
> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Pecan vs Falcon?
> 
> Sandy Walsh wrote:
>> Anyone had any experience with this? Specs are impressive.
>>
>> http://falconframework.org/
> 
> Given that it is developed by Kurt Griffiths @ Rackspace, and used in
> Marconi, I'm pretty sure he has a strong opinion on it :)
> 
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
> Release Manager, OpenStack
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>