Gary, #3 should be possible. Allow projects to use [DATABASE] instead of [DEFAULT]. Can you please open a bug? I'll help. -- dims On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Gary Kotton <gkotton at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > We are in the process of adding the OSLO DB support to Quantum. There are > a number of issues here: > 1. The common DB code does not support foreign key constraints with sqlite > (https://review.openstack.org/**#/c/27320/<https://review.openstack.org/#/c/27320/> > ) > 2. The common code does not have a database cleanup. This is something > that we use in the quantum automatic tests to try and keep the memory > footprint small (https://review.openstack.org/**#/c/27322/<https://review.openstack.org/#/c/27322/> > ) > 3. In the current Quantum versions all of the database configuration > information is under a section [DATABASE]. The common code moves this to > [DEFAULT]. If possible it would be great if we could preserve the current > configuration file settings. This will enable us to have smoother version > upgrades. If this is not possible then we will need a migration script to > update configuration files. Does anyone have thoughts on this? I would like > to make changes to the common code to ensure that we can use the DATABASE > section. > Thanks > Gary > > ______________________________**_________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.**org <OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org> > http://lists.openstack.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**openstack-dev<http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev> > -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130423/040f9157/attachment.html>