[openstack-dev] [Heat] TOSCA support blueprint updated after design discussions at Havana summit

Thomas Spatzier thomas.spatzier at de.ibm.com
Mon Apr 22 20:34:47 UTC 2013


Steven,

> From: Steven Hardy <shardy at redhat.com>
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
<openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>,
> Date: 22.04.2013 14:54
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] TOSCA support blueprint updated
> after design discussions at Havana summit
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 05:32:22PM +0200, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
> >
> > Heaters,
> >
> > I have just updated the blueprint [1] for adding TOSCA support in Heat
to
> > reflect the outcome of discussions at the design summit.
> > Please have a look if this matches your understanding as well and post
> > comments if anything should be changed.
> >
> > Thanks again to everyone at the summit for the great discussions we
had. It
> > was great to meat all of you and working with you!
> >
> > [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/tosca-support
>
> Looks good, but I'm wondering if we should either revise the summary
> wording (and title) to reflect the narrowed scope we discussed (e.g "Add
> support for translation of TOSCA templates to native DSL"), or raise a
new
> BP and mark this one superseded?

I would opt for changing the title and summary of the BP to fit to the
latest discussions instead of superseeding this with a new BP. If you
agree, I will take a first pass tomorrow and we can iterate over it.
Makes sense to make this BP dependent on the DSL BP as a pre-req. We would
probably keep the TOSCA (or additional formats) translation BP on hold and
focus on the DSL and its implementation for now and then see what we can
achieve on top and when.

Ok for everyone?

>
> I've approved the DSL blueprint (and changed the title and description a
> bit, I hope Adrian is OK with that..):
>
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/open-api-dsl
>
> We can use this to track the definition and implementation of the native
> DSL discussed at the summit.
>
> I've made the tosca-support BP depend on open-api-dsl, as my
understanding
> is we're now aiming to add a standalone translation tool to do a one-time
> re-rendering of TOSCA into the native DSL format, once we've defined and
> implemented it.
>
> Steve
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list