Open Stack

OK, we're all good on the concept.  Apologies for being disorganised, and I
think I've left it a bit late for a Friday meeting (not to mention the fact
that I would struggle to squeeze it in, myself).

I suggest we meet at the Cisco stand 5 minutes after the morning sessions
end on Monday and discuss it over lunch.  Looks like there's a reasonable
lunch break, more still if we run into the period when the lightning talks
are on.

-- 
Ian.

On 11 April 2013 16:42, Jiang, Yunhong <yunhong.jiang at intel.com> wrote:

>  +1 for preliminary meeting.****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Bob Ball [mailto:bob.ball at citrix.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 10, 2013 3:54 AM
>
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List
> *Cc:* Ian Wells (iawells at cisco.com) (iawells at cisco.com)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] Further SR-IOV / PCI passthrough
> discussion?****
>
>  ** **
>
> I’d rather go for a preliminary meeting at the summit – but am open to a
> webex on Friday if that would make more sense.****
>
> ** **
>
> Bob****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Irena Berezovsky [mailto:irenab at mellanox.com <irenab at mellanox.com>]
>
> *Sent:* 10 April 2013 05:47
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List
> *Cc:* Ian Wells (iawells at cisco.com) (iawells at cisco.com)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] Further SR-IOV / PCI passthrough
> discussion?****
>
> ** **
>
> I agree that we need to discuss the use cases and gain understanding of
> the separation of concerns for involved components such as virtualization
> driver, compute  scheduler , virtual network provisioning service
> (Quantum), etc.****
>
> I think it worth to get another discussion before the sessions.****
>
> Both alternatives, webex and preliminary meeting at the summit are fine.**
> **
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,****
>
> Irena****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Ian Wells [mailto:ijw.ubuntu at cack.org.uk <ijw.ubuntu at cack.org.uk>]
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 10, 2013 5:58 AM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List
> *Subject:* [openstack-dev] Further SR-IOV / PCI passthrough discussion?***
> *
>
> ** **
>
> Subsequent to last week's PCI passthrough meeting, does anyone care to
> talk any further about it?
>
> I've had some interest in talking over use cases for passthrough as a
> driver to discuss what features we might want (quite justified, since the
> last discussion was pretty low level, and based on my and others'
> experiences in developing for passthrough).  I've also had someone reach
> out from the Xen camp about passthrough for Xen - which comes as no
> surprise but does indicate that whatever we do should have a clean
> interface at the virtualisation driver level.****
>
> We could****
>
> - talk further on a webex****
>
> - have a birds of a feather meeting at the summit prior to the
> session-and-a-half that we have scheduled****
>
> - leave the presenters to deal with the information we've gathered so far
> about passthrough and have our further conversations during the sessions
> themselves.****
>
> I would say it depends on whether we want a detailed proposal for work
> (interfaces, units of work, timelines) to be presented in the sessions or
> whether we would prefer to have the discussions then and deal with the plan
> of work afterward.
>
> Thoughts?****
>
> Regards,
> -- ****
>
> Ian.****
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130412/28df033b/attachment.html>