Hi Yapping NO this diagram talks with about modelling. Basically it depends on each implementation # I'll remove the term of physical :) Thanks Nachi 2013/4/11 Yapeng Wu <Yapeng.Wu at huawei.com>: > Nachi, > > I have one question regarding of the page 3 in the slide. > > The "VPNGW (Physical)" here implies the physical box terminates VPN connection. Does it have to be physical device? Or physical is one of the implementation? > > Thanks, > yapeng > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nachi Ueno [mailto:nachi at ntti3.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 9:59 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Qunatum] 2nd Quantum VPN discussion > > Hi folks > > I would like to share the result of 2nd Quantum VPN discussion which > held today on conf call. > > We discussed general model of VPN based on usecase we agreed on the 1st meeting. > Current consensus is here, but we will continue model discussion on the Summit. > > In the model, each VPN extension will create each own ServiceType, > and inject it to the Router using Service insertion. > > https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1LdL0Fy9PpEQXB9q_c47iJ6gyA1oZn7B6MKbzFyk73tI/edit#slide=id.p > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/HavanaVPNaaS > > Thanks > Nachi NTT > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev