Open Stack

The physical device will be all abstraction in the plugin layer. 

As a whole, the consensus on the call was to follow the model introduced by LBaaS 

Sachin 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Yapeng Wu" <Yapeng.Wu at huawei.com> 
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org> 
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:45:33 AM 
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Qunatum] 2nd Quantum VPN discussion 

Nachi, 

I have one question regarding of the page 3 in the slide. 

The "VPNGW (Physical)" here implies the physical box terminates VPN connection. Does it have to be physical device? Or physical is one of the implementation? 

Thanks, 
yapeng 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Nachi Ueno [mailto:nachi at ntti3.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 9:59 PM 
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List 
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Qunatum] 2nd Quantum VPN discussion 

Hi folks 

I would like to share the result of 2nd Quantum VPN discussion which 
held today on conf call. 

We discussed general model of VPN based on usecase we agreed on the 1st meeting. 
Current consensus is here, but we will continue model discussion on the Summit. 

In the model, each VPN extension will create each own ServiceType, 
and inject it to the Router using Service insertion. 

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1LdL0Fy9PpEQXB9q_c47iJ6gyA1oZn7B6MKbzFyk73tI/edit#slide=id.p 

https://etherpad.openstack.org/HavanaVPNaaS 

Thanks 
Nachi NTT 

_______________________________________________ 
OpenStack-dev mailing list 
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org 
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 

_______________________________________________ 
OpenStack-dev mailing list 
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org 
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130411/80a864f4/attachment.html>