Open Stack

+1

Would like to join too, 1PM PST sounds good. I guess Mark is also hoping that we can structure the several contributions in a good flow and where possible combine them etc, guess we can cover that also.

BR
Alan

-----Original Message-----
From: Nachi Ueno [mailto:nachi at ntti3.com] 
Sent: April-03-13 8:59 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Quantum] Summit Sessions

Hi  Vasudevan

+1
I would like to join
How about 4/5  1pm (PST)  on the IRC?

I created etherpad page for this discussion https://etherpad.openstack.org/HavanaVPNaaS

Thanks
Nachi

2013/4/3 Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville) <swaminathan.vasudevan at hp.com>:
> Hi Mark McClain,
>
> I would like to have a discussion on the VPNaaS for the quantum prior 
> to the Havana summit.
>
> Is there a discussion group for the VPNaaS, if so could you please 
> forward me the details.
>
> If not can we start a discussion group to discuss the VPNaaS blueprint 
> before the summit.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Swaminathan Vasudevan
> Systems Software Engineer (TC)
>
>
> HP ProCurve
> Hewlett-Packard
> 8000 Foothills Blvd
> M/S 5541
> Roseville, CA - 95747
> tel: 916.785.0937
> fax: 916.785.1815
> email: swaminathan.vasudevan at hp.com
>
> From: Mark McClain [mailto:mark.mcclain at dreamhost.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 9:37 AM
>
>
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Quantum] Summit Sessions
>
>
>
> All-
>
> I know we're busy working on the final push to get the docs ready for 
> the Grizzly release.  I wanted to remind the team that summit session 
> proposals are due by the end of March.
>
> You can submit your proposals here:
>
> http://summit.openstack.org.
>
> A couple of reminders:
> * It is not about who proposed first.  If we have multiple proposals 
> for the same topic, the sessions most likely will be merged.
> * We want to have a good balance of community projects vs shiny features.
> Community projects are projects that benefit the community as a whole (i.e.
> metadata service, db migration, L3 multi host).
> * Design sessions are a good way to discuss, build consensus and 
> recruit others to help with implementation.
> * If you have a mini-topic make a note in your proposal.  Mini-topics 
> are something we'll spend around 15mins discussing.
>
> Here are a few of the topics that would be good candidates to discuss 
> in
> Portland:
>
> * How can we make Quantum Simpler ((tm)) For deployers? For developers?
>             * How do we make it easier to deploy Quantum in common cases?
> * Improved Unit Testing
> * Improved Tempest Testing
> * Improved Quantum API Testing in Nova
> * Improving Quantum Documentation
> * L3
>             * IPv6 Support
>             * Pluggable IPAM
>             * ACLs
>             * richer NAT API (tcp/udp port forwarding)
> * Modular L2 and L3
> * Database Improvements (how to handle trunk chasers, model 
> extensions)
> * Full Multi-Host L3
> * Device management and scheduling for services
> * DNS and Quantum
> * Bare-metal
> * Physical Switch Interactions
> * SR-IOV
> * VPNaaS (important to separate use cases: site-to-site, sslvpn, 
> mpls-vpn)
> * LBaaS (how do we extend upon the foundation created in Grizzly)
>
> Have something that's not in the list?  This list does not cover 
> everything, so feel free to propose it on the summit website.
>
> I hope you're excited as I am for the Grizzly release, and I'm looking 
> forward discussing Havana Portland,
>
> mark
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev