[openstack-dev] [Quantum] security groups now enforced w/devstack
Yoshihiro Kaneko
ykaneko0929 at gmail.com
Fri Sep 21 07:49:05 UTC 2012
Hi Akihiro,
Does Security Groups function?
VM came to be able to obtain an IP address by DHCP, but Security
Groups still does not work. There is nova-compute chains for an
instance, but it does not match any packet.
Security Groups makes iptables rules in the root name space. That
rule has fixed IP address of a target instance as a destination.
On the other, Quantum L3 agent makes SNAT rules in qrouter name
space, so I think fixed IP address is not found in the root name space.
In addition, I think that Security Groups does not work correctly when
there is more than one VM with the same fixed IP address. If so, we
should choose between Security Groups or Overlapping IP range.
Thanks,
Kaneko
2012/9/20 Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929 at gmail.com>:
> Hi Akihiro,
>
> I submitted bug report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1053312
> Please add comment for the details.
>
> Thanks,
> Kaneko
>
> 2012/9/20 Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929 at gmail.com>:
>> Hi Akihiro,
>>
>> 2012/9/20 Akihiro MOTOKI <amotoki at gmail.com>:
>>> Hi Yoshihiro,
>>>
>>> Thank for testing.
>>> Have you already filed a bug for this problem? If not yet, could you
>>> file it as a nova bug?
>>> It is a "folsom-rc-potential" bug and needs to be fixed I think.
>>
>> Sure, will do.
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> 2012/9/20 Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929 at gmail.com>:
>>>> 2012/9/20 Akihiro MOTOKI <motoki at da.jp.nec.com>:
>>>>> Hi Dan, Yoshihiro,
>>>>>
>>>>> I investigated the problem Yoshihiro reported more.
>>>>>
>>>>> When nova-compute launches an instance on KVM, vif driver plug() is called
>>>>> twice
>>>>> accorrding to the nova-compute log [1].
>>>>>
>>>>> LibvirtHybridOVSBridgeDriver plug() calles
>>>>> nova.network.linux_net._create_veth_pair()
>>>>> to create veth pair. _create_veth_pair() checks whether the specified device
>>>>> exists
>>>>> and in case the device exists it first deletes the device and (re)creates
>>>>> it.
>>>>> It may be a cause of the problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> After the following change [2], this problem seems to be addressed.
>>>>> If this direction is OK, I will post a patch to gerrit.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yoshihiro,
>>>>> Could you test my patch on your environment?
>>>>
>>>> Great!
>>>> qvo was listed in brctl show and ovs-ofctl show and VM obtained an IP
>>>> address by DHCP.
>>>>
>>>> $ sudo ovs-vsctl show
>>>> 6d7929f6-8b09-41bc-b775-1ef50915eb7b
>>>> Bridge br-int
>>>> Port "tap94dddc19-c7"
>>>> tag: 1
>>>> Interface "tap94dddc19-c7"
>>>> type: internal
>>>> Port "qvo4307567c-49"
>>>> tag: 1
>>>> Interface "qvo4307567c-49"
>>>> Port "qr-56b7fd42-93"
>>>> tag: 1
>>>> Interface "qr-56b7fd42-93"
>>>> type: internal
>>>> Port br-int
>>>> Interface br-int
>>>> type: internal
>>>> Bridge br-ex
>>>> Port br-ex
>>>> Interface br-ex
>>>> type: internal
>>>> Port "eth1"
>>>> Interface "eth1"
>>>> Port "qg-e399dae7-66"
>>>> Interface "qg-e399dae7-66"
>>>> type: internal
>>>> ovs_version: "1.4.0+build0"
>>>> $ brctl show
>>>> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
>>>> br-ex 0000.ae454d673043 no qg-e399dae7-66
>>>> br-int 0000.a6c5c5495143 no qr-56b7fd42-93
>>>> qvo4307567c-49
>>>> tap94dddc19-c7
>>>> qbr4307567c-49 8000.3ab31e81960e no qvb4307567c-49
>>>> vnet0
>>>> virbr0 8000.000000000000 yes
>>>> virbr1 8000.525400d8a792 yes virbr1-nic
>>>> $ sudo ovs-ofctl show br-int
>>>> OFPT_FEATURES_REPLY (xid=0x1): ver:0x1, dpid:0000a6c5c5495143
>>>> n_tables:255, n_buffers:256
>>>> features: capabilities:0xc7, actions:0xfff
>>>> 1(tap94dddc19-c7): addr:78:00:00:00:00:00
>>>> config: PORT_DOWN
>>>> state: LINK_DOWN
>>>> 2(qr-56b7fd42-93): addr:78:00:00:00:00:00
>>>> config: PORT_DOWN
>>>> state: LINK_DOWN
>>>> 3(qvo4307567c-49): addr:fe:9f:c2:68:9b:7a
>>>> config: 0
>>>> state: 0
>>>> current: 10GB-FD COPPER
>>>> LOCAL(br-int): addr:a6:c5:c5:49:51:43
>>>> config: PORT_DOWN
>>>> state: LINK_DOWN
>>>> OFPT_GET_CONFIG_REPLY (xid=0x3): frags=normal miss_send_len=0
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Kaneko
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> $ grep "qvo612b2502-6e" ~/logs/screen-n-cpu.log | grep ^Running
>>>>> Running cmd (subprocess): sudo nova-rootwrap /etc/nova/rootwrap.conf ip link
>>>>> show dev qvo612b2502-6e
>>>>> Running cmd (subprocess): sudo nova-rootwrap /etc/nova/rootwrap.conf ip link
>>>>> add qvb612b2502-6e type veth peer name qvo612b2502-6e
>>>>> Running cmd (subprocess): sudo nova-rootwrap /etc/nova/rootwrap.conf ip link
>>>>> set qvo612b2502-6e up
>>>>> Running cmd (subprocess): sudo nova-rootwrap /etc/nova/rootwrap.conf ip link
>>>>> set qvo612b2502-6e promisc on
>>>>> Running cmd (subprocess): sudo nova-rootwrap /etc/nova/rootwrap.conf
>>>>> ovs-vsctl -- --may-exist add-port br-int qvo612b2502-6e -- set Interface
>>>>> qvo612b2502-6e external-ids:iface-id=612b2502-6e8c-4a78-aedd-c5cb08738564
>>>>> external-ids:iface-status=active external-ids:attached-mac=fa:16:3e:97:e4:aa
>>>>> external-ids:vm-uuid=f0321c00-8ef0-4a18-9921-8452236877f2
>>>>> Running cmd (subprocess): sudo nova-rootwrap /etc/nova/rootwrap.conf ip link
>>>>> show dev qvo612b2502-6e
>>>>> Running cmd (subprocess): sudo nova-rootwrap /etc/nova/rootwrap.conf ip link
>>>>> add qvb612b2502-6e type veth peer name qvo612b2502-6e
>>>>> Running cmd (subprocess): sudo nova-rootwrap /etc/nova/rootwrap.conf ip link
>>>>> set qvo612b2502-6e up
>>>>> Running cmd (subprocess): sudo nova-rootwrap /etc/nova/rootwrap.conf ip link
>>>>> set qvo612b2502-6e promisc on
>>>>> Running cmd (subprocess): sudo nova-rootwrap /etc/nova/rootwrap.conf
>>>>> ovs-vsctl -- --may-exist add-port br-int qvo612b2502-6e -- set Interface
>>>>> qvo612b2502-6e external-ids:iface-id=612b2502-6e8c-4a78-aedd-c5cb08738564
>>>>> external-ids:iface-status=active external-ids:attached-mac=fa:16:3e:97:e4:aa
>>>>> external-ids:vm-uuid=f0321c00-8ef0-4a18-9921-8452236877f2
>>>>>
>>>>> [2]
>>>>> diff --git a/nova/virt/libvirt/vif.py b/nova/virt/libvirt/vif.py
>>>>> index 1a64765..ea0834d 100644
>>>>> --- a/nova/virt/libvirt/vif.py
>>>>> +++ b/nova/virt/libvirt/vif.py
>>>>> @@ -212,15 +212,15 @@ class
>>>>> LibvirtHybridOVSBridgeDriver(LibvirtBridgeDriver,
>>>>> br_name = self.get_br_name(iface_id)
>>>>> v1_name, v2_name = self.get_veth_pair_names(iface_id)
>>>>>
>>>>> - linux_net._create_veth_pair(v1_name, v2_name)
>>>>> -
>>>>> if not linux_net._device_exists(br_name):
>>>>> utils.execute('brctl', 'addbr', br_name, run_as_root=True)
>>>>>
>>>>> - utils.execute('ip', 'link', 'set', br_name, 'up', run_as_root=True)
>>>>> - utils.execute('brctl', 'addif', br_name, v1_name, run_as_root=True)
>>>>> - self.create_ovs_vif_port(v2_name, iface_id, mapping['mac'],
>>>>> - instance['uuid'])
>>>>> + if not linux_net._device_exists(v2_name):
>>>>> + linux_net._create_veth_pair(v1_name, v2_name)
>>>>> + utils.execute('ip', 'link', 'set', br_name, 'up',
>>>>> run_as_root=True)
>>>>> + utils.execute('brctl', 'addif', br_name, v1_name,
>>>>> run_as_root=True)
>>>>> + self.create_ovs_vif_port(v2_name, iface_id, mapping['mac'],
>>>>> + instance['uuid'])
>>>>>
>>>>> network['bridge'] = br_name
>>>>> return self._get_configurations(instance, network, mapping)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> (2012/09/20 13:13), Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Has nobody encountered this problem? Only me?
>>>>>> I will try this in other fresh environment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kaneko
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2012/9/19 Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929 at gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I found that qvo was not "internal". Therefore I set "type=internal"
>>>>>>> to qvo manually.
>>>>>>> As a result, qvo appeared in the output of "brctl show" and VM was
>>>>>>> able to obtain
>>>>>>> IP address by DHCP.
>>>>>>> Is this correct?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Before set interface type
>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>> $ sudo ovs-vsctl show
>>>>>>> 6d7929f6-8b09-41bc-b775-1ef50915eb7b
>>>>>>> Bridge br-int
>>>>>>> Port "tap8c462a80-f6"
>>>>>>> tag: 1
>>>>>>> Interface "tap8c462a80-f6"
>>>>>>> type: internal
>>>>>>> Port "qvo076911a5-59"
>>>>>>> tag: 1
>>>>>>> Interface "qvo076911a5-59"
>>>>>>> Port br-int
>>>>>>> Interface br-int
>>>>>>> type: internal
>>>>>>> Port "qr-6dd16ab9-d6"
>>>>>>> tag: 1
>>>>>>> Interface "qr-6dd16ab9-d6"
>>>>>>> type: internal
>>>>>>> Bridge br-ex
>>>>>>> Port br-ex
>>>>>>> Interface br-ex
>>>>>>> type: internal
>>>>>>> Port "qg-de1db666-3d"
>>>>>>> Interface "qg-de1db666-3d"
>>>>>>> type: internal
>>>>>>> Port "eth1"
>>>>>>> Interface "eth1"
>>>>>>> ovs_version: "1.4.0+build0"
>>>>>>> $ brctl show
>>>>>>> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
>>>>>>> br-ex 0000.ae454d673043 no qg-de1db666-3d
>>>>>>> br-int 0000.c6d8e9064848 no qr-6dd16ab9-d6
>>>>>>> tap8c462a80-f6
>>>>>>> qbr076911a5-59 8000.26397c9d0d15 no
>>>>>>> qvb076911a5-59
>>>>>>> vnet0
>>>>>>> virbr0 8000.000000000000 yes
>>>>>>> virbr1 8000.525400d8a792 yes virbr1-nic
>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Set interface type to qvo
>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>> $ sudo ovs-vsctl set Interface qvo076911a5-59 type=internal
>>>>>>> $ sudo ovs-vsctl show
>>>>>>> 6d7929f6-8b09-41bc-b775-1ef50915eb7b
>>>>>>> Bridge br-int
>>>>>>> Port "tap8c462a80-f6"
>>>>>>> tag: 1
>>>>>>> Interface "tap8c462a80-f6"
>>>>>>> type: internal
>>>>>>> Port "qvo076911a5-59"
>>>>>>> tag: 1
>>>>>>> Interface "qvo076911a5-59"
>>>>>>> type: internal
>>>>>>> Port br-int
>>>>>>> Interface br-int
>>>>>>> type: internal
>>>>>>> Port "qr-6dd16ab9-d6"
>>>>>>> tag: 1
>>>>>>> Interface "qr-6dd16ab9-d6"
>>>>>>> type: internal
>>>>>>> Bridge br-ex
>>>>>>> Port br-ex
>>>>>>> Interface br-ex
>>>>>>> type: internal
>>>>>>> Port "qg-de1db666-3d"
>>>>>>> Interface "qg-de1db666-3d"
>>>>>>> type: internal
>>>>>>> Port "eth1"
>>>>>>> Interface "eth1"
>>>>>>> ovs_version: "1.4.0+build0"
>>>>>>> $ brctl show
>>>>>>> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
>>>>>>> br-ex 0000.ae454d673043 no qg-de1db666-3d
>>>>>>> br-int 0000.c6d8e9064848 no qr-6dd16ab9-d6
>>>>>>> qvo076911a5-59
>>>>>>> tap8c462a80-f6
>>>>>>> qbr076911a5-59 8000.26397c9d0d15 no
>>>>>>> qvb076911a5-59
>>>>>>> vnet0
>>>>>>> virbr0 8000.000000000000 yes
>>>>>>> virbr1 8000.525400d8a792 yes virbr1-nic
>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kaneko
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2012/9/19 Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929 at gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I re-added qvo to br-int manually, then it appeared in the output of
>>>>>>>> "brctl show".
>>>>>>>> And VM was able to obtain an IP address by DHCP.
>>>>>>>> What I did is as follows.
>>>>>>>> sudo ovs-vsctl del-port qvoXXXX
>>>>>>>> sudo ovs-vsctl add-port br-int qvoXXXX
>>>>>>>> sudo ovs-vsctl set port qvoXXXX tag=1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I restarted devstack without re-add qvo, the problem was reproduced.
>>>>>>>> VM could not obtain IP address from DHCP server.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And I re-added qvo manually again. In this time, I did a thing same as
>>>>>>>> vif-driver recorded in a syslog. Then, VM obtains an IP address by DHCP
>>>>>>>> again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> sudo ovs-vsctl del-port qvoXXXX
>>>>>>>> sudo ovs-vsctl -- --may-exist add-port br-int qvoXXX -- set Interface
>>>>>>>> qvoXXXX
>>>>>>>> external-ids:iface-id=XXXX external-ids:iface-status=active
>>>>>>>> external-ids:attached-mac=XXXX external-ids:vm-uuid=XXXX
>>>>>>>> (VLAN tag was added automatically)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What should I do next?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kaneko
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2012/9/18 Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929 at gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2012/9/18 Dan Wendlandt <dan at nicira.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko
>>>>>>>>>> <ykaneko0929 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Dan,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the reply.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This is the result of "brctl show".
>>>>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>>>>> $ brctl show
>>>>>>>>>>> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
>>>>>>>>>>> br-ex 0000.6e47647aee44 no
>>>>>>>>>>> qg-8c3a652b-f1
>>>>>>>>>>> br-int 0000.4af0ded34a40 no
>>>>>>>>>>> qr-f9a49be5-c1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> tap5a418ee0-53
>>>>>>>>>>> qbr99eea189-fc 8000.5e15f4c7d4f2 no
>>>>>>>>>>> qvb99eea189-fc
>>>>>>>>>>> vnet0
>>>>>>>>>>> virbr0 8000.000000000000 yes
>>>>>>>>>>> virbr1 8000.525400d8a792 yes virbr1-nic
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> can you send the output of
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ovs-vsctl list-ports br-int (or ovs-vsctl show)?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Its odd that the above output does not include qvo99eea189-fc, which
>>>>>>>>>> should be attached to br-int.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is the output. I restarted devstack, so the interface name is
>>>>>>>>> different from above.
>>>>>>>>> There is not "qvo" in the output of "brctl show". But it exists in
>>>>>>>>> "ovs-vsctl list-ports br-int"
>>>>>>>>> (and "ovs-vsctl show"). And not found in "ovs-dpctl show br-int".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>>> $ sudo brctl show
>>>>>>>>> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
>>>>>>>>> br-ex 0000.2a93351db24b no qg-669c94f9-41
>>>>>>>>> br-int 0000.363636554a4e no qr-185216c4-b7
>>>>>>>>> tap4061a128-21
>>>>>>>>> qbra5838945-25 8000.d639643f11ef no
>>>>>>>>> qvba5838945-25
>>>>>>>>> vnet0
>>>>>>>>> virbr0 8000.000000000000 yes
>>>>>>>>> virbr1 8000.525400d8a792 yes virbr1-nic
>>>>>>>>> $
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> $ sudo ovs-vsctl list-ports br-int
>>>>>>>>> qr-185216c4-b7
>>>>>>>>> qvoa5838945-25
>>>>>>>>> tap4061a128-21
>>>>>>>>> $
>>>>>>>>> $ sudo ovs-dpctl show br-int
>>>>>>>>> system at br-int:
>>>>>>>>> lookups: hit:7 missed:14 lost:0
>>>>>>>>> flows: 0
>>>>>>>>> port 0: br-int (internal)
>>>>>>>>> Sep 18
>>>>>>>>> 16:35:45|00001|netdev_linux|WARN|/sys/class/net/tap4061a128-21/carrier:
>>>>>>>>> open failed: No such file or directory
>>>>>>>>> port 1: tap4061a128-21 (internal)
>>>>>>>>> Sep 18
>>>>>>>>> 16:35:45|00002|netdev_linux|WARN|/sys/class/net/qr-185216c4-b7/carrier:
>>>>>>>>> open failed: No such file or directory
>>>>>>>>> port 2: qr-185216c4-b7 (internal)
>>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Kaneko
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> dan
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Following is the result that was running tcpdump on each terminal
>>>>>>>>>>> concurrently.
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know why each DHCP packet was received twice on vnet0. And
>>>>>>>>>>> the tap
>>>>>>>>>>> device used by dnsmasq did not receive udp packet in qdhcp-
>>>>>>>>>>> namespace.
>>>>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>>>>> # tcpdump -ni vnet0 udp
>>>>>>>>>>> tcpdump: WARNING: vnet0: no IPv4 address assigned
>>>>>>>>>>> tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol
>>>>>>>>>>> decode
>>>>>>>>>>> listening on vnet0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535
>>>>>>>>>>> bytes
>>>>>>>>>>> 12:00:56.619340 IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP,
>>>>>>>>>>> Request from fa:16:3e:48:aa:85, length 280
>>>>>>>>>>> 12:00:56.619423 IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP,
>>>>>>>>>>> Request from fa:16:3e:48:aa:85, length 280
>>>>>>>>>>> 12:00:59.624796 IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP,
>>>>>>>>>>> Request from fa:16:3e:48:aa:85, length 280
>>>>>>>>>>> 12:00:59.624858 IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP,
>>>>>>>>>>> Request from fa:16:3e:48:aa:85, length 280
>>>>>>>>>>> 12:01:02.630474 IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP,
>>>>>>>>>>> Request from fa:16:3e:48:aa:85, length 280
>>>>>>>>>>> 12:01:02.630564 IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP,
>>>>>>>>>>> Request from fa:16:3e:48:aa:85, length 280
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> # tcpdump -ni qvb99eea189-fc udp
>>>>>>>>>>> tcpdump: WARNING: qvb99eea189-fc: no IPv4 address assigned
>>>>>>>>>>> tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol
>>>>>>>>>>> decode
>>>>>>>>>>> listening on qvb99eea189-fc, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture
>>>>>>>>>>> size
>>>>>>>>>>> 65535 bytes
>>>>>>>>>>> 12:00:56.619436 IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP,
>>>>>>>>>>> Request from fa:16:3e:48:aa:85, length 280
>>>>>>>>>>> 12:00:59.624872 IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP,
>>>>>>>>>>> Request from fa:16:3e:48:aa:85, length 280
>>>>>>>>>>> 12:01:02.630586 IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP,
>>>>>>>>>>> Request from fa:16:3e:48:aa:85, length 280
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> # tcpdump -ni qvo99eea189-fc udp
>>>>>>>>>>> tcpdump: WARNING: qvo99eea189-fc: no IPv4 address assigned
>>>>>>>>>>> tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol
>>>>>>>>>>> decode
>>>>>>>>>>> listening on qvo99eea189-fc, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture
>>>>>>>>>>> size
>>>>>>>>>>> 65535 bytes
>>>>>>>>>>> 12:00:56.619467 IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP,
>>>>>>>>>>> Request from fa:16:3e:48:aa:85, length 280
>>>>>>>>>>> 12:00:59.624904 IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP,
>>>>>>>>>>> Request from fa:16:3e:48:aa:85, length 280
>>>>>>>>>>> 12:01:02.630633 IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP,
>>>>>>>>>>> Request from fa:16:3e:48:aa:85, length 280
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> # tcpdump -ni tap5a418ee0-53 udp
>>>>>>>>>>> tcpdump: tap5a418ee0-53: No such device exists
>>>>>>>>>>> (SIOCGIFHWADDR: No such device)
>>>>>>>>>>> # ip netns exec qdhcp-c95edcb8-3df6-4e92-a367-4fce5bce6e63 tcpdump
>>>>>>>>>>> -ni
>>>>>>>>>>> tap5a418ee0-53 udp
>>>>>>>>>>> tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol
>>>>>>>>>>> decode
>>>>>>>>>>> listening on tap5a418ee0-53, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture
>>>>>>>>>>> size
>>>>>>>>>>> 65535 bytes
>>>>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> When using
>>>>>>>>>>> "libvirt_vif_driver=nova.virt.libvirt.vif.LibvirtOpenVswitchDriver",
>>>>>>>>>>> VM can obtain an IP address by DHCP.
>>>>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>>>>> $ grep libvirt_vif_driver /etc/nova/nova.conf
>>>>>>>>>>> libvirt_vif_driver=nova.virt.libvirt.vif.LibvirtOpenVswitchDriver
>>>>>>>>>>> $ nova console-log vm1
>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>> Starting network...
>>>>>>>>>>> udhcpc (v1.18.5) started
>>>>>>>>>>> Sending discover...
>>>>>>>>>>> Sending select for 10.0.0.3...
>>>>>>>>>>> Lease of 10.0.0.3 obtained, lease time 120
>>>>>>>>>>> deleting routers
>>>>>>>>>>> route: SIOCDELRT: No such process
>>>>>>>>>>> adding dns 10.0.0.2
>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Kaneko
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012/9/17 Dan Wendlandt <dan at nicira.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kaneko,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the detailed report. At a glance, things look correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd suggest running tcpdump on various interfaces to figure how far
>>>>>>>>>>>> the DHCP requests/responses are reaching.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> tcpdump -ni vnetX udp (replace vnetX with correct device... can't
>>>>>>>>>>>> tell
>>>>>>>>>>>> from your output. try running brctl show).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> tcpdump -ni qvb99eea189-fc udp (veth device on VIF-specific
>>>>>>>>>>>> bridge)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> tcpdump -ni qvo99eea189-fc udp (veth device on main OVS bridge)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> tcpdump -ni tap5a418ee0-53 udp (tap device used by dnsmasq)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Another interesting data point would be whether you only see these
>>>>>>>>>>>> issues when using
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "libvirt_vif_driver=nova.virt.libvirt.vif.LibvirtHybridOVSBridgeDriver",
>>>>>>>>>>>> or whether you also see it with
>>>>>>>>>>>> "libvirt_vif_driver=nova.virt.libvirt.vif.LibvirtOpenVswitchDriver
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Yoshihiro Kaneko
>>>>>>>>>>>> <ykaneko0929 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Dan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I tried it on Ubuntu 12.04. However VM could not obtain an IP
>>>>>>>>>>>>> address from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a DHCP server.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any advice?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If more information is needed, please let me know.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ git clone git://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cloning into 'devstack'...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> remote: Counting objects: 6415, done.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> remote: Compressing objects: 100% (2186/2186), done.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> remote: Total 6415 (delta 4352), reused 6145 (delta 4151)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Receiving objects: 100% (6415/6415), 1.10 MiB | 470 KiB/s, done.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolving deltas: 100% (4352/4352), done.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ cd devstack/
>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ git fetch https://review.openstack.org/openstack-dev/devstack
>>>>>>>>>>>>> refs/changes/50/11650/8 && git checkout FETCH_HEAD
>>>>>>>>>>>>> remote: Counting objects: 5, done
>>>>>>>>>>>>> remote: Finding sources: 100% (3/3)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> remote: Total 3 (delta 2), reused 3 (delta 2)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unpacking objects: 100% (3/3), done.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> From https://review.openstack.org/openstack-dev/devstack
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * branch refs/changes/50/11650/8 -> FETCH_HEAD
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: checking out 'FETCH_HEAD'.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are in 'detached HEAD' state. You can look around, make
>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental
>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes and commit them, and you can discard any commits you make
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in this
>>>>>>>>>>>>> state without impacting any branches by performing another
>>>>>>>>>>>>> checkout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want to create a new branch to retain commits you create,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you may
>>>>>>>>>>>>> do so (now or later) by using -b with the checkout command again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Example:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> git checkout -b new_branch_name
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> HEAD is now at cea6c51... Quantum enhancements
>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ vi localrc
>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ cat localrc
>>>>>>>>>>>>> disable_service n-net
>>>>>>>>>>>>> enable_service q-svc q-agt q-dhcp q-l3 quantum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ cp samples/local.sh .
>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ ./stack.sh
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ . ./openrc demo demo
>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ nova image-list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ quantum net-list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ nova boot --flavor 6 --image 7777d0ed-294c-4634-9304-769f64a52c81
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --nic net-id=c95edcb8-3df6-4e92-a367-4fce5bce6e63 vm1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ nova list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +--------------------------------------+------+--------+---------------+
>>>>>>>>>>>>> | ID | Name | Status | Networks
>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +--------------------------------------+------+--------+---------------+
>>>>>>>>>>>>> | 723d76c4-4dea-4fe4-a4d8-6ca8d08bb936 | vm1 | ACTIVE |
>>>>>>>>>>>>> net1=10.0.0.3 |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +--------------------------------------+------+--------+---------------+
>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ nova console-log vm1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Starting network...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> udhcpc (v1.18.5) started
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sending discover...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sending discover...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sending discover...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No lease, failing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> WARN: /etc/rc3.d/S40-network failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ sudo ovs-vsctl show
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6d7929f6-8b09-41bc-b775-1ef50915eb7b
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bridge br-ex
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Port "qg-8c3a652b-f1"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interface "qg-8c3a652b-f1"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> type: internal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Port br-ex
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interface br-ex
>>>>>>>>>>>>> type: internal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bridge br-int
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Port "tap5a418ee0-53"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tag: 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interface "tap5a418ee0-53"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> type: internal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Port "qr-f9a49be5-c1"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tag: 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interface "qr-f9a49be5-c1"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> type: internal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Port "qvo99eea189-fc"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tag: 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interface "qvo99eea189-fc"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Port br-int
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interface br-int
>>>>>>>>>>>>> type: internal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ovs_version: "1.4.0+build0"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ ip netns
>>>>>>>>>>>>> qrouter-aed60aac-288b-41ee-bc4a-9ed5a356a16d
>>>>>>>>>>>>> qdhcp-c95edcb8-3df6-4e92-a367-4fce5bce6e63
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ ps ax|grep dnsmasq
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6107 ? S 0:00 dnsmasq --no-hosts --no-resolv
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --strict-order --bind-interfaces --interface=tap5a418ee0-53
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --except-interface=lo --domain=openstacklocal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --pid-file=/opt/stack/data/dhcp/c95edcb8-3df6-4e92-a367-4fce5bce6e63/pid
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --dhcp-hostsfile=/opt/stack/data/dhcp/c95edcb8-3df6-4e92-a367-4fce5bce6e63/host
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --dhcp-optsfile=/opt/stack/data/dhcp/c95edcb8-3df6-4e92-a367-4fce5bce6e63/opts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --dhcp-script=/opt/stack/quantum/bin/quantum-dhcp-agent-dnsmasq-lease-update
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --leasefile-ro --dhcp-range=set:tag0,10.0.0.0,static,120s
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6108 ? S 0:00 dnsmasq --no-hosts --no-resolv
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --strict-order --bind-interfaces --interface=tap5a418ee0-53
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --except-interface=lo --domain=openstacklocal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --pid-file=/opt/stack/data/dhcp/c95edcb8-3df6-4e92-a367-4fce5bce6e63/pid
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --dhcp-hostsfile=/opt/stack/data/dhcp/c95edcb8-3df6-4e92-a367-4fce5bce6e63/host
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --dhcp-optsfile=/opt/stack/data/dhcp/c95edcb8-3df6-4e92-a367-4fce5bce6e63/opts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --dhcp-script=/opt/stack/quantum/bin/quantum-dhcp-agent-dnsmasq-lease-update
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --leasefile-ro --dhcp-range=set:tag0,10.0.0.0,static,120s
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 28913 pts/1 S+ 0:00 grep --color=auto dnsmasq
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kaneko
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2012/9/14 Dan Wendlandt <dan at nicira.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi quantum hackers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're pushing a change to devstack to use a new vif-driver for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quantum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with Open vSwitch (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/11650/). The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> benefit of this driver is that it is compatible with Nova's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> security
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group filtering. This is "a good thing", since it more closely
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to how real users will deploy Quantum.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, this may catch developers by surprise who are suddenly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to ping or SSH to instances because the security groups drop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> traffic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by default.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Preferred method of dealing with this is to add the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lines to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local.sh in your devstack directory, which open up your VMs for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ping
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and SSH for the 'demo' user:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nova secgroup-add-rule default icmp -1 -1 0.0.0.0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nova secgroup-add-rule default tcp 22 22 0.0.0.0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another work around is to disable nova security groups by adding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'LIBVIRT_FIREWALL_DRIVER=nova.virt.firewall.NoopFirewallDriver' to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your localrc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dan Wendlandt
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> twitter: danwendlandt
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dan Wendlandt
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> twitter: danwendlandt
>>>>>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>>> Dan Wendlandt
>>>>>>>>>> Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com
>>>>>>>>>> twitter: danwendlandt
>>>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Akihiro MOTOKI <amotoki at gmail.com>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list