[openstack-dev] Introducing Synaps project that provides AWS CloudWatch compatible API

Endre Karlson endre.karlson at gmail.com
Tue Oct 16 07:04:07 UTC 2012


Any news on this ? :)

Endre.

2012/10/12 Joonwon Lee <joonwon7.lee at samsung.com>

> Dear Mark,
> Thanks for your kind advice again.
>
> Now I understand that there is a license issue. I also heard from
> inside that we may have a patent issue unless our patent team verify
> Synaps won't violate any other patents. We definitely need some time
> for preparing the contribution of our project to the open community.
> Again I will try to shorten it, but I cannot let you see our codes
> before the Design Summit next week. I'm really sorry about that.
>
> Mark, Eoghan, Steve, Endre, Nick, Doug, Sam, Thierry, thanks you all
> for having interests in our project. We will continue our efforts
> to show Synaps to you soon.
>
> Still I welcome any comments, advices, questions, etc. about Synaps.
>
> Regards,
> Joonwon Lee
>
>
> ------- Original Message -------
> Sender : Mark McLoughlin<markmc at redhat.com>
> Date : Oct 12, 2012 20:53 (GMT+09:00)
> Title : Re: Re: [openstack-dev] Introducing Synaps project that provides
> AWS CloudWatch compatible API
>
> On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 11:23 +0000, Joonwon Lee wrote:
> > Hi, Mark.
> > I expect that we need a few weeks for opening Synaps. (maybe early Nov.)
> > However, as I completely agree with Mark, I tried my best to find a way.
>
> Thank you for your efforts
>
> > We're going to send directly the source codes of Synaps to you tomorrow:
> >     Mark McLoughlin, Eoghan Glynn, Steve Hardy (Heat developers, Red Hat)
> > I hope it will help you deciding the direction next week at the Summit.
> > You may see them and ask any questions, but don't make them public yet.
> > (Are there other people who want to see our codes first and work with
> us?)
>
> Actually, I don't think this is such a good idea. If you shared the code
> outside Samsung, the license you're sharing it under would not be clear
> at this point and if the code doesn't eventually licensed under the
> Apache License it potentially could cause legal trouble.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20121016/83e2ca3a/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list